Literature DB >> 31774345

Modulatory effects of the supplementary motor area on primary motor cortex outputs.

Sandrine L Côté1, Guillaume Elgbeili2, Stephan Quessy1, Numa Dancause1.   

Abstract

Premotor areas of primates are specialized cortical regions that can contribute to hand movements by modulating the outputs of the primary motor cortex (M1). The goal of the present work was to study how the supplementary motor area (SMA) located within the same hemisphere [i.e., ipsilateral SMA (iSMA)] or the opposite hemisphere [i.e., contralateral (cSMA)] modulate the outputs of M1. We used paired-pulse protocols with intracortical stimulations in sedated capuchin monkeys. A conditioning stimulus in iSMA or cSMA was delivered simultaneously or before a test stimulus in M1 with different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) while electromyographic activity was recorded in hand and forearm muscles. The pattern of modulation from iSMA and cSMA shared some clear similarities. In particular, both areas predominantly induced facilitatory effects on M1 outputs with shorter ISIs and inhibitory effects with longer ISIs. However, the incidence and strength of facilitatory effects were greater for iSMA than cSMA. We then compared the pattern of modulatory effects from SMA to the ones from the dorsal and ventral premotor cortexes (PMd and PMv) collected in the same series of experiments. Among premotor areas, the impact of SMA on M1 outputs was always weaker than the one of either PMd or PMv, and this was regardless of the hemisphere, or the ISI, tested. These results show that SMA exerts a unique set of modulations on M1 outputs, which could support its specific function for the production of hand movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We unequivocally isolated stimulation to either the ipsilateral or contralateral supplementary motor area (SMA) using invasive techniques and compared their modulatory effects on the outputs of primary motor cortex (M1). Modulations from both SMAs shared many similarities. However, facilitatory effects evoked from ipsilateral SMA were more common and more powerful. This pattern differs from the ones of other premotor areas, which suggests that each premotor area makes unique contributions to the production of motor outputs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical network; hand movement; interhemispheric interaction; neuromodulation; premotor cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31774345      PMCID: PMC6985856          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00391.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interhemispheric interaction between human dorsal premotor and contralateral primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mochizuki; Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Topographically divergent and convergent connectivity between premotor and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Scott Barbay; Shawn B Frost; Erik J Plautz; Mihai Popescu; Philip M Dixon; Ann M Stowe; Kathleen M Friel; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping.

Authors:  Marco Davare; Michael Andres; Guy Cosnard; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  R P Dum; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Both supplementary and presupplementary motor areas are crucial for the temporal organization of multiple movements.

Authors:  K Shima; J Tanji
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effective connectivity between human supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex: a paired-coil TMS study.

Authors:  Noritoshi Arai; Ming-Kuei Lu; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Kinematically specific interhemispheric inhibition operating in the process of generation of a voluntary movement.

Authors:  J Duque; R Mazzocchio; J Dambrosia; N Murase; E Olivier; L G Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Modulatory Effects of the Ipsi and Contralateral Ventral Premotor Cortex (PMv) on the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Outputs to Intrinsic Hand and Forearm Muscles in Cebus apella.

Authors:  Stephan Quessy; Sandrine L Côté; Adjia Hamadjida; Joan Deffeyes; Numa Dancause
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  An additional motor-related field in the lateral frontal cortex of squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Vanja Duric; Scott Barbay; Shawn B Frost; Antonis Stylianou; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interhemispheric modulations of motor outputs by the rostral and caudal forelimb areas in rats.

Authors:  Boris Touvykine; Guillaume Elgbeili; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Rapid and Bihemispheric Reorganization of Neuronal Activity in Premotor Cortex after Brain Injury.

Authors:  Ian Moreau-Debord; Éléonore Serrano; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Temporal changes in cortical oxygenation in the motor-related areas and bilateral prefrontal cortex based on exercise intensity and respiratory metabolism during incremental exercise in male subjects: A near-Infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Shinichiro Morishita; Kazuki Hotta; Weixiang Qin; Naoto Usui; Atsuhiro Tsubaki
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective.

Authors:  Franziska E Hildesheim; Alexander N Silver; Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Justin W Andrushko; Jodi D Edwards; Numa Dancause; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.