Literature DB >> 8530722

Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years.

S Gladys1, B Van Meerbeek, S Inokoshi, G Willems, M Braem, P Lambrechts, G Vanherle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The marginal quality of four tooth-coloured inlay systems was clinically investigated and subjected to computer-aided semiquantitative marginal analysis under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after 3 years of clinical service.
METHODS: Three of the restoration types were made using the Cerec CAD-CAM apparatus: one was milled from preformed glass ceramic blocks, and the two other inlay types were milled from preformed porcelain blocks. The fourth system was based on an experimental indirect resin composite inlay system. Each inlay type was luted with a different luting resin composite. The clinical evaluation was performed with a mirror and explorer by two clinicians separately, and the marginal analysis was conducted microscopically on replicas (SEM x 200).
RESULTS: After 3 years in situ, all the restorations were clinically acceptable. No recurrent caries was observed. Marginal analysis under SEM detected a high percentage of submargination for all four systems, which suggests that their respective resin composite luting agents were all subject to wear. The percentage of marginal fractures on the enamel side as well as on the inlay side did not increase dramatically compared to the 6-month results.
CONCLUSION: The first recall after 6 months of clinical service indicated how tooth-coloured inlays behave at their margins. The 3-year results confirmed the early findings, indicating that wear of resin composite lutes is important and present in all systems. The two ceramic materials showed a similar behaviour at the margins. The resin composite inlay performed better at the inlay site than at the enamel site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8530722     DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)98768-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  9 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Systematic review of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson; C A Yeung; H V Worthington
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities.

Authors:  Juan R Mayoral; Ladislav Gregor; Edson A Campos; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.

Authors:  Juergen Manhart; Cordula Trumm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Caroline Prot; Cyrille Fonteneau; Karim Nasr; Olivier Chabreron; Stéphane Cazier; Christian Moussally; Alexandre Gaucher; Inès Khabthani Ben Jaballah; Renaud Boyer; Jean-François Leforestier; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Florence Chemla; Louis Maman; Cathy Nabet; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ayşe Gözde Türk; Metin Sabuncu; Sena Ünal; Banu Önal; Mübin Ulusoy
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays.

Authors:  Joana Souza; Mª Victoria Fuentes; Eugenia Baena; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.634

9.  Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin.

Authors:  Manuel Salvador Urcuyo Alvarado; Diana María Escobar García; Amaury de Jesús Pozos Guillén; Juan Carlos Flores Arriaga; Gabriel Fernando Romo Ramírez; Marine Ortiz Magdaleno
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-09-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.