Literature DB >> 19937075

Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.

Juergen Manhart1, Cordula Trumm.   

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the marginal adaptation of etch-and-rinse adhesives. Standardized class II cavities were cut in 40 human molars with one proximal box limited within enamel and one proximal box extending into dentin. Teeth were assigned randomly to five groups (n = 8) and restored with incrementally placed composite restorations. Five combinations were tested: G1, XP Bond + Ceram-X Mono; G2, P&amp;B NT + Ceram-X Mono; G3, Optibond Solo Plus + Ceram-X Mono; R1, Syntac Classic + Tetric EvoCeram; R2, Scotchbond 1 XT + Z250. After finishing and polishing, teeth were stored for 48 h in water at 37°C before subjected to artificial aging by thermal stress (5/55°C; ×2,000; 30 s) and mechanical loading (50 N; ×50,000). Marginal adaptation of the restorations was evaluated in a SEM (×200) using a replica technique. Statistical analysis was performed with nonparametric test methods (p < 0.05). The percentages of "perfect margin" after aging ranged from 95.9% to 99.6% in enamel and 85.9% to 96.0% in dentin. "Marginal opening" was observed between 0.1% to 2.6% in enamel and 2.6% to 11.8% in dentin. In enamel and dentin, both, G3 showed significantly more gap formation than G1 and G2. Comparing marginal adaptation to enamel and dentin within each group yielded only for G1 no significant differences. Tert-butanol-based XP Bond showed excellent marginal adaptation in both enamel and dentin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937075     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0353-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  44 in total

1.  How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding.

Authors:  G D Pereira; L A Paulillo; M F De Goes; C T Dias
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.

Authors:  Jan De Munck; Bart Van Meerbeek; Inoue Satoshi; Marcos Vargas; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Steven Armstrong; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator.

Authors:  Karlheinz Moll; Andreas Fritzenschaft; Bernd Haller
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Influence of different surface treatments on marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin.

Authors:  Ioana Onisor; Serge Bouillaguet; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  [Esthetic adhesive filling in posterior teeth--an illusion?].

Authors:  R Mayer
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1991-07

7.  Marginal adaptation of Class 2 adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Sillas Duarte; José Roberto Cury Saad
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing.

Authors:  D Dietschi; D Herzfeld
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface.

Authors:  F R Tay; A J Gwinnett; S H Wei
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  4 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of different types of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel of deciduous teeth in vitro.

Authors:  A Kensche; F Dähne; C Wagenschwanz; G Richter; G Viergutz; C Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities.

Authors:  Juan R Mayoral; Ladislav Gregor; Edson A Campos; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of endodontic irrigants on microtensile bond strength to dentin after thermocycling and long-term water storage.

Authors:  Daniel Galafassi; Vivian Colucci; Doglas Cecchin; Camila Scatena; Telma N Nascimento; Silmara A M Corona
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Maha M Ebaya; Ashraf I Ali; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.