Literature DB >> 8530709

Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations.

B Hammer1, D Ettlin, B Rahn, J Prein.   

Abstract

Using a 3-dimensional in vitro model, the stability of different types of osteosynthesis for the short sagittal osteotomy was tested. The following four groups of plate and screw configurations were evaluated: Group I: Fixation with miniplates using monocortical screws only, Group II: Fixation with miniplates, but with two of the screws engaging both fragments, Group III: Same as group II with an additional position screw, Group IV: Fixation with 3 position screws. The stability obtained with miniplate fixation using monocortical screws only (group I) was by a factor of 2.9 less than position screw fixation (group IV), which is considered to be an approved standard. In order to increase the stability of miniplate fixation, the screws in the area of overlapping bone should engage both fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8530709     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80164-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System.

Authors:  Leandro Stocco Baccarin; Renato Correa Viana Casarin; Jorge Vicente Lopes-da-Silva; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

2.  [Osteosynthesis after sagittal division of the mandible. Biomechanical stability of various methods in a pig mandibular model].

Authors:  H Pistner; J F Reuther; R Ordung; J Bill; I Voges
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-07

3.  Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of conventional screws and cannulated screws for sagittal split osteotomy fixation: a comparative study.

Authors:  Cristina Jardelino de Lima; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci; Danillo Costa Rodrigues; Érica Cristina Marchiori; Roger Willian Fernandes Moreira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-06

4.  Effect of perioperative buccal fracture of the proximal segment on postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Yoon Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Jeong-Joon Han; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-22

5.  An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Valdir Cabral Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Fabio Loureiro Sato; Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Jose Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-23

6.  Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement.

Authors:  Felipe Ladeira Pereira; Marcos Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 8.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Leandro Benetti de Olivera; Eduardo Sant' Ana; Antonio José Manzato; Fábio Luis Bunemer Guerra; G William Arnett
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.