Literature DB >> 8529753

Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.

K Kasai1, T Moro, E Kanazawa, T Iwasawa.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the relationships between the cranial base and maxillofacial morphology in Japanese crania, and to examine the differences between Class I and Class II samples. Data were obtained from 46 male Japanese crania from the collection of the Jikei University School of Medicine (Tokyo). The sample represents populations which would have lived during the last 100 years. A principal component analysis of linear and angular measurements showed that the anterior and posterior cranial base, and the cranial base angle were associated in different ways with different aspects of maxillofacial morphology. Variation in the anterior cranial base was associated with differences in facial height, lower facial height, bicondylar breadth, ramal height, and ramal width, while posterior cranial base length was correlated with bizygomatic breadth. The cranial base angle was negatively correlated with SNA (r = -0.46) and SNB (r = -0.59), and positively correlated with the palatal and occlusal plane angles. There were significant differences between Class I and Class II specimens in palatal width, SNA, ANB, and the palatal plane angle, but no significant difference in cranial base length or angle. The evidence suggested that cranial base shape and size was related to facial length, inclination of the maxilla, and both maxillary and mandibular prognathism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8529753     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/17.5.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-02

2.  Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.

Authors:  Anirudh Agarwal; Harsh Pandey; Kamal Bajaj; Lavesh Pandey
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-02-26

3.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  An anthropometric study of relationships between the clival angle and craniofacial measurements in adult human skulls.

Authors:  L Guyot; O Richard; P Adalian; C Bartoli; O Dutour; G Leonetti
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse.

Authors:  Katherine Elizabeth Willmore; Miriam Leah Zelditch; Nathan Young; Andrew Ah-Seng; Scott Lozanoff; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Amarjitsingh Bhatia; Dolly Patel; Nishit Mehta; Harshik Parekh; Rahul Trivedi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

7.  Morphological configuration of the cranial base among children aged 8 to 12 years.

Authors:  Lina Cossio; Jorge López; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Paola Botero-Mariaca
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 8.  Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kélei Cristina Mathias de Almeida; Taísa Boamorte Raveli; Camila Ivini Viana Vieira; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

9.  Application of the foramina of the trigeminal nerve as landmarks for analysis of craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  Ba-Da Lim; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.