Literature DB >> 8529142

A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture.

L Halloran1.   

Abstract

Computers increasingly are being integrated into nursing education. One method of integration is through computer managed instruction (CMI). Recently, technology has become available that allows the integration of keypad questions into CMI. This brings a new type of interactivity between students and teachers into the classroom. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in achievement between a control group taught by traditional classroom lecture (TCL) and an experimental group taught using CMI and keypad questions. Both control and experimental groups consisted of convenience samples of junior nursing students in a baccalaureate program taking a medical/surgical nursing course. Achievement was measured by three instructor-developed multiple choice examinations. Findings demonstrated that although the experimental group demonstrated increasingly higher test scores as the semester progressed, no statistical difference was found in achievement between the two groups. One reason for this may be phenomenon of vampire video. Initially, the method of presentation overshadowed the content. As students became desensitized to the method, they were able to focus and absorb more content. This study suggests that CMI and keypads are a viable teaching option for nursing education. It is equal to TCL in student achievement and provides a new level of interaction in the classroom setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8529142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Nurs        ISSN: 0736-8593


  4 in total

1.  The evaluation of computer-aided learning in medicine.

Authors:  J Panikkar; T Draycott; J Cook
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN54535861].

Authors:  Edward J Palmer; Peter G Devitt; Neville J De Young; David Morris
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Assessment Competency of Nurses in Biological Incidents.

Authors:  Abbas Ebadi; Shahla Yousefi; Morteza Khaghanizade; Yaser Saeid
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2015-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.