Literature DB >> 8528073

Redesign of the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase to that of Escherichia coli tyrosine aminotransferase by homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis.

J J Onuffer1, J F Kirsch.   

Abstract

Although several high-resolution X-ray crystallographic structures have been determined for Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase (eAATase), efforts to crystallize E. coli tyrosine aminotransferase (eTATase) have been unsuccessful. Sequence alignment analyses of eTATase and eAATase show 43% sequence identity and 72% sequence similarity, allowing for conservative substitutions. The high similarity of the two sequences indicates that both enzymes must have similar secondary and tertiary structures. Six active site residues of eAATase were targeted by homology modeling as being important for aromatic amino acid reactivity with eTATase. Two of these positions (Thr 109 and Asn 297) are invariant in all known aspartate aminotransferase enzymes, but differ in eTATase (Ser 109 and Ser 297). The other four positions (Val 39, Lys 41, Thr 47, and Asn 69) line the active site pocket of eAATase and are replaced by amino acids with more hydrophobic side chains in eTATase (Leu 39, Tyr 41, Ile 47, and Leu 69). These six positions in eAATase were mutated by site-directed mutagenesis to the corresponding amino acids found in eTATase in an attempt to redesign the substrate specificity of eAATase to that of eTATase. Five combinations of the individual mutations were obtained from mutagenesis reactions. The redesigned eAATase mutant containing all six mutations (Hex) displays second-order rate constants for the transamination of aspartate and phenylalanine that are within an order of magnitude of those observed for eTATase. Thus, the reactivity of eAATase with phenylalanine was increased by over three orders of magnitude without sacrificing the high transamination activity with aspartate observed for both enzymes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8528073      PMCID: PMC2143225          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560040910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  35 in total

1.  Why ion pair reversal by protein engineering is unlikely to succeed.

Authors:  J K Hwang; A Warshel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Amino acid biosynthesis and its regulation.

Authors:  H E Umbarger
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Engineering an enzyme by site-directed mutagenesis to be resistant to chemical oxidation.

Authors:  D A Estell; T P Graycar; J A Wells
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Designing substrate specificity by protein engineering of electrostatic interactions.

Authors:  J A Wells; D B Powers; R R Bott; T P Graycar; D A Estell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.

Authors:  T A Kunkel; J D Roberts; R A Zakour
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Proteases of enhanced stability: characterization of a thermostable variant of subtilisin.

Authors:  P N Bryan; M L Rollence; M W Pantoliano; J Wood; B C Finzel; G L Gilliland; A J Howard; T L Poulos
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1986-12

7.  Glutamic-aspartic transaminase. IX. Equilibria with glutamate and alpha-ketoglutarate.

Authors:  W T Jenkins; L D'Ari
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1966-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Mechanism of action of aspartate aminotransferase proposed on the basis of its spatial structure.

Authors:  J F Kirsch; G Eichele; G C Ford; M G Vincent; J N Jansonius; H Gehring; P Christen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The use of natural and unnatural amino acid substrates to define the substrate specificity differences of Escherichia coli aspartate and tyrosine aminotransferases.

Authors:  J J Onuffer; B T Ton; I Klement; J F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Role of arginine-292 in the substrate specificity of aspartate aminotransferase as examined by site-directed mutagenesis.

Authors:  C N Cronin; J F Kirsch
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-06-14       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  22 in total

1.  A general method for the quantitative analysis of functional chimeras: applications from site-directed mutagenesis and macromolecular association.

Authors:  T N Luong; J F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Engineering homooligomeric proteins to detect weak intersite allosteric communication: aminotransferases, a case study.

Authors:  Edgar Deu; Jack F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Aspartate aminotransferase: an old dog teaches new tricks.

Authors:  Michael D Toney
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 4.  Evolutionary recruitment of biochemically specialized subdivisions of Family I within the protein superfamily of aminotransferases.

Authors:  R A Jensen; W Gu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  A streptavidin mutant with altered ligand-binding specificity.

Authors:  G O Reznik; S Vajda; T Sano; C R Cantor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Directed evolution of an aspartate aminotransferase with new substrate specificities.

Authors:  T Yano; S Oue; H Kagamiyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  PLP and GABA trigger GabR-mediated transcription regulation in Bacillus subtilis via external aldimine formation.

Authors:  Rui Wu; Ruslan Sanishvili; Boris R Belitsky; Jose I Juncosa; Hoang V Le; Helaina J S Lehrer; Michael Farley; Richard B Silverman; Gregory A Petsko; Dagmar Ringe; Dali Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Defective regulation of autophagy upon leucine deprivation reveals a targetable liability of human melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Sheen; Roberto Zoncu; Dohoon Kim; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Redesign of substrate-selectivity determining modules of glutathione transferase A1-1 installs high catalytic efficiency with toxic alkenal products of lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  L O Nilsson; A Gustafsson; B Mannervik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Selective Targeting by a Mechanism-Based Inactivator against Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate-Dependent Enzymes: Mechanisms of Inactivation and Alternative Turnover.

Authors:  Romila Mascarenhas; Hoang V Le; Kenneth D Clevenger; Helaina J Lehrer; Dagmar Ringe; Neil L Kelleher; Richard B Silverman; Dali Liu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.