Literature DB >> 8524241

A bipartite operator interacts with a heat shock element to mediate early meiotic induction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP82.

C Szent-Gyorgyi1.   

Abstract

Although key genetic regulators of early meiotic transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been well characterized, the activation of meiotic genes is still poorly understood in terms of cis-acting DNA elements and their associated factors. I report here that induction of HSP82 is regulated by the early meiotic IME1-IME2 transcriptional cascade. Vegetative repression and meiotic induction depend on interactions of the promoter-proximal heat shock element (HSE) with a nearby bipartite repression element, composed of the ubiquitous early meiotic motif, URS1 (upstream repression sequence 1), and a novel ancillary repression element. The ancillary repression element is required for efficient vegetative repression, is spatially separable from URS1, and continues to facilitate repression during sporulation. In contrast, URS1 also functions as a vegetative repression element but is converted early in meiosis into an HSE-dependent activation element. An early step in this transformation may be the antagonism of URS1-mediated repression by IME1. The HSE also nonspecifically supports a second major mode of meiotic activation that does not require URS1 but does require expression of IME2 and concurrent starvation. Interestingly, increased rather than decreased URS1-mediated vegetative transcription can be artificially achieved by introducing rare point mutations into URS1 or by deleting the UME6 gene. These lesions offer insight into mechanisms of URS-dependent repression and activation. Experiments suggest that URS1-bound factors functionally modulate heat shock factor during vegetative transcription and early meiotic induction but not during heat shock. The loss of repression and activation observed when the IME2 activation element, T4C, is substituted for the HSE suggests specific requirements for URS1-upstream activation sequence interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8524241      PMCID: PMC230929          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.12.6754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  79 in total

1.  Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo.

Authors:  D Picard; B Khursheed; M J Garabedian; M G Fortin; S Lindquist; K R Yamamoto
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The yeast heat shock transcription factor contains a transcriptional activation domain whose activity is repressed under nonshock conditions.

Authors:  J Nieto-Sotelo; G Wiederrecht; A Okuda; C S Parker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Expression of HSP86 in male germ cells.

Authors:  S J Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A cis-acting element present in multiple genes serves as a repressor protein binding site for the yeast CAR1 gene.

Authors:  R M Luche; R Sumrada; T G Cooper
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Role of IME1 expression in regulation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H E Smith; S S Su; L Neigeborn; S E Driscoll; A P Mitchell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Yeast heat shock factor contains separable transient and sustained response transcriptional activators.

Authors:  P K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Structure and regulation of the SSA4 HSP70 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  W R Boorstein; E A Craig
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A novel mammalian protein kinase gene (mak) is highly expressed in testicular germ cells at and after meiosis.

Authors:  H Matsushime; A Jinno; N Takagi; M Shibuya
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Dual regulation of meiosis in yeast.

Authors:  R E Malone
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Regulation of a yeast HSP70 gene by a cAMP responsive transcriptional control element.

Authors:  W R Boorstein; E A Craig
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  19 in total

1.  Role of UME6 in transcriptional regulation of a DNA repair gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D H Sweet; Y K Jang; G B Sancar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The Sin3p PAH domains provide separate functions repressing meiotic gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael J Mallory; Michael J Law; Lela E Buckingham; Randy Strich
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-10-22

3.  SAGA and Rpd3 chromatin modification complexes dynamically regulate heat shock gene structure and expression.

Authors:  Selena B Kremer; David S Gross
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Gal4p-mediated chromatin remodeling depends on binding site position in nucleosomes but does not require DNA replication.

Authors:  M Xu; R T Simpson; M P Kladde
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  A mutation in an HSP90 gene affects the sexual cycle and suppresses vegetative incompatibility in the fungus Podospora anserina.

Authors:  G Loubradou; J Bégueret; B Turcq
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Identification of the Sin3-binding site in Ume6 defines a two-step process for conversion of Ume6 from a transcriptional repressor to an activator in yeast.

Authors:  B K Washburn; R E Esposito
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Participation of the yeast activator Abf1 in meiosis-specific expression of the HOP1 gene.

Authors:  V Gailus-Durner; J Xie; C Chintamaneni; A K Vershon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Nutritional regulation of late meiotic events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a pathway distinct from initiation.

Authors:  R H Lee; S M Honigberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The unfolded protein response represses differentiation through the RPD3-SIN3 histone deacetylase.

Authors:  Martin Schröder; Robert Clark; Chuan Yin Liu; Randal J Kaufman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1.

Authors:  I Rubin-Bejerano; S Mandel; K Robzyk; Y Kassir
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.