Literature DB >> 11238941

Identification of the Sin3-binding site in Ume6 defines a two-step process for conversion of Ume6 from a transcriptional repressor to an activator in yeast.

B K Washburn1, R E Esposito.   

Abstract

The DNA-binding protein Ume6 is required for both repression and activation of meiosis-specific genes, through interaction with the Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase and the meiotic activator Ime1. Here we show that fusion of a heterologous activation domain to Ume6 is unable to convert it into a constitutive activator of early meiotic gene transcription, indicating that an additional function is needed to overcome repression at these promoters. Mutations in UME6 allowing the fusion to activate lie in a predicted amphipathic alpha helix and specifically disrupt interaction with Sin3 but not with Teal, an activator of Ty transcription also found to interact with Ume6 in a two-hybrid screen. The mutations cause a loss of repression by Ume6 and precisely identify the Ume6 Sin3-binding domain, which we show interacts with the paired amphipathic helix 2 region of Sin3. Analysis of these mutants indicates that conversion of Ume6 to an activator involves two genetically distinct steps that act to relieve Sin3-mediated repression and provide an activation domain to Ume6. The mutants further demonstrate that premature expression and lack of subsequent rerepression of Ume6-Sin3-regulated genes are not deleterious to meiotic progression and suggest that the essential role of Sin3 in meiosis is independent of Ume6. The model for Ume6 function arising from these studies indicates that Ume6 is similar in many respects to metazoan regulators that utilize Sin3, such as the Myc-Mad-Max system and nuclear hormone receptors, and provides new insights into the control of transcriptional repression and activation by the Ume6-URS1 regulatory complex in yeast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11238941      PMCID: PMC86811          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.6.2057-2069.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  91 in total

1.  SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  C Geourjon; G Deléage
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-02

2.  Detection of protein-protein interactions using different vectors in the two-hybrid system.

Authors:  P Legrain; M C Dokhelar; C Transy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  IME1 gene encodes a transcription factor which is required to induce meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Mandel; K Robzyk; Y Kassir
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1994

Review 4.  Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A P Mitchell
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-03

5.  Genetic evidence for transcriptional activation by the yeast IME1 gene product.

Authors:  H E Smith; S E Driscoll; R A Sia; H E Yuan; A P Mitchell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Vectors for the inducible overexpression of glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins in yeast.

Authors:  D A Mitchell; T K Marshall; R J Deschenes
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K S Bowdish; A P Mitchell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes.

Authors:  M Vidal; R Strich; R E Esposito; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Vidal; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein.

Authors:  H Wang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  44 in total

1.  E2F mediates cell cycle-dependent transcriptional repression in vivo by recruitment of an HDAC1/mSin3B corepressor complex.

Authors:  Joseph B Rayman; Yasuhiko Takahashi; Vahan B Indjeian; Jan-Hermen Dannenberg; Steven Catchpole; Roger J Watson; Hein te Riele; Brian David Dynlacht
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The Ume6 regulon coordinates metabolic and meiotic gene expression in yeast.

Authors:  Roy M Williams; Michael Primig; Brian K Washburn; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Michel Bellis; Cyril Sarrauste de Menthiere; Ronald W Davis; Rochelle E Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional analysis of the Mad1-mSin3A repressor-corepressor interaction reveals determinants of specificity, affinity, and transcriptional response.

Authors:  Shaun M Cowley; Richard S Kang; John V Frangioni; Jason J Yada; Alec M DeGrand; Ishwar Radhakrishnan; Robert N Eisenman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The Zap1 transcriptional activator also acts as a repressor by binding downstream of the TATA box in ZRT2.

Authors:  Amanda J Bird; Elizabeth Blankman; David J Stillman; David J Eide; Dennis R Winge
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  The family feud: turning off Sp1 by Sp1-like KLF proteins.

Authors:  Gwen Lomberk; Raul Urrutia
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Ime1 and Ime2 are required for pseudohyphal growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on nonfermentable carbon sources.

Authors:  Natalie Strudwick; Max Brown; Vipul M Parmar; Martin Schröder
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The Sin3p PAH domains provide separate functions repressing meiotic gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael J Mallory; Michael J Law; Lela E Buckingham; Randy Strich
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-10-22

8.  How the Rgt1 transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by glucose.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Polish; Jeong-Ho Kim; Mark Johnston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Molecular genetic analysis of the yeast repressor Rfx1/Crt1 reveals a novel two-step regulatory mechanism.

Authors:  Zhengjian Zhang; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Kinetochore inactivation by expression of a repressive mRNA.

Authors:  Jingxun Chen; Amy Tresenrider; Minghao Chia; David T McSwiggen; Gianpiero Spedale; Victoria Jorgensen; Hanna Liao; Folkert Jacobus van Werven; Elçin Ünal
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.