Literature DB >> 8523284

Comparison of three keratometry instruments.

D G Tennen1, R H Keates, C Montoya.   

Abstract

We compared the reliability of measurements of three keratometers and keratometry readings from a corneal topography system to determine if they were as accurate as the "gold standard" Javal-Schiotz keratometer. Same-day measurement of the steepest and flattest powers of the central 3 mm of the corneas of 200 eyes (100 patients) revealed no statistically significant difference in reliability between the newer keratometers and the Javal-Schiotz. In addition, the newer machines are more convenient and efficient in some clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8523284     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80530-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

1.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  The Distribution of Keratometry in a Population Based Study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Abbasali Yekta; Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Alireza Hashemi; Samira Heydarian; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-26

3.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements Obtained by Aladdin Optical Biometer and Sirius Corneal Topography.

Authors:  Onur Polat; Zeki Baysal; Serkan Özcan; Sibel İnan; Ümit Übeyt İnan
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.