Literature DB >> 8520744

Beneficial effects of the "open lung approach" with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation.

M B Amato1, C S Barbas, D M Medeiros, G de P Schettino, G Lorenzi Filho, R A Kairalla, D Deheinzelin, C Morais, E de O Fernandes, T Y Takagaki.   

Abstract

Alveolar overdistention and cyclic reopening of collapsed alveoli have been implicated in the lung damage found in animals submitted to artificial ventilation. To test whether these phenomena are impairing the recovery of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) submitted to conventional mechanical ventilation (MV), we evaluated the impact of a new ventilatory strategy directed at minimizing "cyclic parenchymal stretch." After receiving pre-established levels of hemodynamic, infectious, and general care, 28 patients with early ARDS were randomly assigned to receive either MV based on a new approach (NA, consisting of maintenance of end-expiratory pressures above the lower inflection point of the P x V curve, VT < 6 ml/kg, peak pressures < 40 cm H2O, permissive hypercapnia, and stepwise utilization of pressure-limited modes) or a conventional approach (C = conventional volume-cycled ventilation, VT = 12 ml/kg, minimum PEEP guided by FIO2 and hemodynamics and normal PaCO2 levels). Fifteen patients were selected to receive NA, exhibiting a better evolution of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (p < 0.0001) and of compliance (p = 0.0018), requiring shorter periods under FIO2 > 50% (p = 0.001) and a lower FIO2 at the day of death (p = 0.0002). After correcting for baseline imbalances in APACHE II, we observed a higher weaning rate in NA (p = 0.014) but not a significantly improved survival (overall mortality: 5/15 in NA versus 7/13 in C, p = 0.45). We concluded that the NA ventilatory strategy can markedly improve the lung function in patients with ARDS, increasing the chances of early weaning and lung recovery during mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8520744     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  87 in total

1.  Elastic pressure-volume curves: what information do they convey?

Authors:  B Jonson; C Svantesson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Critical role for CXCR2 and CXCR2 ligands during the pathogenesis of ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  John A Belperio; Michael P Keane; Marie D Burdick; Vedang Londhe; Ying Ying Xue; Kewang Li; Roderick J Phillips; Robert M Strieter
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  [Emergency anesthesia, airway management and ventilation in major trauma. Background and key messages of the interdisciplinary S3 guidelines for major trauma patients].

Authors:  G Matthes; M Bernhard; K G Kanz; C Waydhas; M Fischbacher; M Fischer; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  The pulmonary physician in critical care * 7: ventilator induced lung injury.

Authors:  T Whitehead; A S Slutsky
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 5.  Right ventricular function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respirator settings.

Authors:  François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Static pressure-volume curve characteristics are moderate estimators of optimal airway pressures in a mathematical model of (primary/pulmonary) acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Dick G Markhorst; Huibert R van Genderingen; Adrianus J van Vught
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Standardized lung recruitment during high frequency and conventional ventilation: similar pathophysiologic and inflammatory responses in an animal model of respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Ramesh K M Krishnan; Pat A Meyers; Cathy Worwa; Ronald Goertz; Galen Schauer; Mark C Mammel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Did studies on HFOV fail to improve ARDS survival because they did not decrease VILI? On the potential validity of a physiological concept enounced several decades ago.

Authors:  Didier Dreyfuss; Jean-Damien Ricard; Stéphane Gaudry
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Breath-to-breath analysis of abdominal and rib cage motion in surfactant-depleted piglets during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

Authors:  Dick G Markhorst; Jos R C Jansen; Adrianus J van Vught; Huibert R van Genderingen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The role of time and pressure on alveolar recruitment.

Authors:  Scott P Albert; Joseph DiRocco; Gilman B Allen; Jason H T Bates; Ryan Lafollette; Brian D Kubiak; John Fischer; Sean Maroney; Gary F Nieman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.