OBJECTIVE: To evaluate standardized lung recruitment strategy during both high frequency oscillation (HFO) and volume-targeted conventional ventilation (CV+V) in spontaneously breathing piglets with surfactant washout on pathophysiologic and inflammatory responses. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four newborn piglets. INTERVENTIONS: We compared pressure support and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, both with targeted tidal volumes, (PSV+V, SIMV+V) to HFO. Animals underwent saline lavage to produce lung injury, received artificial surfactant and were randomized to one of the three treatment groups (each n=8). After injury and surfactant replacement, lung volumes were recruited in all groups using a standard protocol. Ventilation continued for 6 h. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial and central venous pressures, heart rates, blood pressure and arterial blood gases were continuously monitored. At baseline, post lung injury and 6 h we collected serum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples for proinflammatory cytokines: IL 6, IL 8 and TNF-alpha, and performed static pressure-volume (P/V) curves. Lungs were fixed for morphometrics and histopathologic analysis. No physiologic differences were found. Analysis of P/V curves showed higher opening pressures after lung injury in the HFO group compared to the SIMV+V group ( p<0.05); no differences persisted after treatment. We saw no differences in change in proinflammatory cytokine levels. Histopathology and morphometrics were similar. Mean airway pressure (P(aw)) was highest in the HFO group compared to SIMV+V ( p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized lung recruitment strategy in spontaneously breathing animals, CV+V produced equivalent pathophysiologic outcomes without an increase in proinflammatory cytokines when compared to HFO.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate standardized lung recruitment strategy during both high frequency oscillation (HFO) and volume-targeted conventional ventilation (CV+V) in spontaneously breathing piglets with surfactant washout on pathophysiologic and inflammatory responses. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four newborn piglets. INTERVENTIONS: We compared pressure support and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, both with targeted tidal volumes, (PSV+V, SIMV+V) to HFO. Animals underwent saline lavage to produce lung injury, received artificial surfactant and were randomized to one of the three treatment groups (each n=8). After injury and surfactant replacement, lung volumes were recruited in all groups using a standard protocol. Ventilation continued for 6 h. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial and central venous pressures, heart rates, blood pressure and arterial blood gases were continuously monitored. At baseline, post lung injury and 6 h we collected serum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples for proinflammatory cytokines: IL 6, IL 8 and TNF-alpha, and performed static pressure-volume (P/V) curves. Lungs were fixed for morphometrics and histopathologic analysis. No physiologic differences were found. Analysis of P/V curves showed higher opening pressures after lung injury in the HFO group compared to the SIMV+V group ( p<0.05); no differences persisted after treatment. We saw no differences in change in proinflammatory cytokine levels. Histopathology and morphometrics were similar. Mean airway pressure (P(aw)) was highest in the HFO group compared to SIMV+V ( p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized lung recruitment strategy in spontaneously breathing animals, CV+V produced equivalent pathophysiologic outcomes without an increase in proinflammatory cytokines when compared to HFO.
Authors: V M Ranieri; P M Suter; C Tortorella; R De Tullio; J M Dayer; A Brienza; F Bruno; A S Slutsky Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A S Naik; S G Kallapur; C J Bachurski; A H Jobe; J Michna; B W Kramer; M Ikegami Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: R E Bell; T J Kuehl; J J Coalson; N B Ackerman; D M Null; M B Escobedo; B A Yoder; J D Cornish; L Nalle; R M Skarin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1984-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ralf M Muellenbach; Markus Kredel; Harun M Said; Bernd Klosterhalfen; Bernd Zollhoefer; Christian Wunder; Andreas Redel; Michael Schmidt; Norbert Roewer; Jörg Brederlau Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-06-12 Impact factor: 17.440