Literature DB >> 8519340

Monocular and binocular neuronal activity in human visual cortex revealed by electrical brain activity mapping.

W Skrandies1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated topographical differences between monocularly and binocularly evoked potential fields related to the retinal location and spatial frequency of grating stimuli. Electrical brain activity was recorded in 18 healthy adults using an array of 21 electrodes over the occipital areas. Vertical black-and-white grating patterns of different spatial frequencies were presented with central fixation or lateralized to the left or right hemiretina. Computation of global field power determined component latency. Topographic characteristics of the field distributions were examined at the individual component latency for each subject using statistical comparisons between experimental conditions. The strength of the potential fields was significantly larger with binocular stimuli, whereas no effects were observed when comparing component latencies. Pronounced differences occurred in the spatial distribution of electrical brain activity: with 2.5 cycles/deg, large, significant topographic differences between monocularly and binocularly evoked activity were obtained. The potential fields showed a more anterior and more lateralized component distribution with binocular than monocular stimuli. In addition, when the gratings were presented binocularly, significant topographic differences were observed when low and high spatial frequency stimuli were compared. Our results suggest that the relationship between the topography of evoked components and retinal stimulus location and spatial frequency is different for monocular and binocular stimuli, indicating that binocular information processing triggers different neuronal processes in the human visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8519340     DOI: 10.1007/BF00229366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Tanino; T Hirose
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1986-04

2.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

3.  Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories.

Authors:  S L Shea; R N Aslin; D McCulloch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; D Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli.

Authors:  W Skrandies; D Lehmann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12

6.  Stereoscopic stimuli activate different cortical neurones in man: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  W Skrandies; H E Vomberg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Are field potentials an appropriate method for demonstrating connections in the brain?

Authors:  W Skrandies; H Wässle; L Peichl
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  The binocular: monocular sensitivity ratio for movement detection varies with temporal frequency.

Authors:  D Rose
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Binocular vision tested with visual evoked potentials in children and infants.

Authors:  G Amigo; A Fiorentini; M Pirchio; D Spinelli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A di Summa; S Fusina; L Bertolasi; S Vicentini; S Perlini; L G Bongiovanni; A Polo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Characteristics of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential in Two Eyes with Varying Visual Acuity in One Eye and Forensic Application.

Authors:  Fu-Quan Jia; Yu-Guang Liang; Xin-Yuan Zhang; Fang-Liang Luo; Yan-He Xiong; Long-Long Cheng; Ji-Hui Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Pattern Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials Provide Clinical Evidence of CNS Modulation of High- and Low-Contrast VEP Latency in Glaucoma.

Authors:  William E Sponsel; Susan L Johnson; Rick Trevino; Alberto Gonzalez; Sylvia L Groth; Carolyn Majcher; Diane C Fulton; Matthew A Reilly
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.