Literature DB >> 8515405

Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery.

M J Miller1, M A Schusterman, G P Reece, S S Kroll.   

Abstract

To characterize the role of interposition vein grafts, and to determine whether their use significantly influences the success of free tissue transfers in head and neck cancer reconstruction, we reviewed 191 consecutive cases with defects involving the aero-digestive tract soft tissues (80), the mandible (75), craniofacial resections (25), or cutaneous coverage (11). One hundred twenty patients had received prior loco-regional therapy, including 63 patients with recurrent lesions. Interposition vein grafts were used for the artery (11), vein (3), or both (3) in a total of 17 cases. The overall technical success rate was 93.2 percent (178/191). Cases in which vein grafts were used had a significantly (p < 0.001) lower success rate, 70.6 percent (12/17), than those without vein grafts, 95 percent (166/175). Grafts were most often used in patients who had received prior therapy (13/17). The use of vein grafts was associated with a significantly higher incidence of flap failure in head and neck cancer reconstruction; however, a causal relationship is not suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8515405     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  11 in total

1.  The indications and reliability of vein graft use in free flap transfer.

Authors:  Dale A Classen
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

2.  A morphometric analysis of the suitability of the transverse cervical artery as a recipient artery in head and neck free flap microvascular reconstruction.

Authors:  M Reissis; Dimitris Reissis; G B Bottini; A Messiha; D C Davies
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The thoracoacromial axis in salvage head and neck reconstructive surgery, a case series.

Authors:  Matthew J Davies; Rhys van der Rijt; Roger Haddad; James Southwell-Keely
Journal:  Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Microvascular craniofacial reconstruction in cancer patients.

Authors:  M J Miller; M A Schusterman; G P Reece; S S Kroll
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for pelvic floor reconstruction following pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  Ahmed Hossamedine Abdou; Lei Li; Karl Khatib-Chahidi; Achim Troja; Phillip Looft; Eva Monika Gudewer; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Dalibor Antolovic
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Clinical features of primary vein grafts in free tissue transfers.

Authors:  Mitsuru Nemoto; Kenichi Kumazawa; Eiju Uchinuma; Natsuko Kounoike; Akira Takeda
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2015-03-12

7.  Composite Arteriovenous Radial Conduit Flap for Lower Limb Reconstruction.

Authors:  Pedro C Cavadas; Burak Sercan Ercin; Alessandro Thione
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-13

8.  Are venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools reliable in the stratification of microvascular risk following lower extremity reconstruction?

Authors:  L Geoghegan; J Super; M Machin; M Gimzewska; S Onida; S Hettiaratchy; A H Davies
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-04-24

9.  Ateriovenous subclavia-shunt for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Rita A Depprich; Christian D Naujoks; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler; Jörg G Handschel
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Transverse cervical vascular pedicle: It's extended use as 'second-line' recipient vessels in thoracic and upper arm reconstructions in addition to head-and-neck reconstructions.

Authors:  Srijana Muppireddy; Parvathi Ravula; Srikanth Rangachari; Najma Shaik; Sushma Maaturu
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2018 May-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.