Ahmed Hossamedine Abdou1, Lei Li2, Karl Khatib-Chahidi3, Achim Troja3, Phillip Looft3, Eva Monika Gudewer2, Hans-Rudolf Raab3, Dalibor Antolovic3. 1. University Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Strasse 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany. ahmedabdou@gmx.de. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Strasse 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany. 3. University Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Strasse 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic floor defects following pelvic exenteration constitute a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Whenever the common reconstruction options such as the gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap (GLM) and the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM) are not feasible, free tissue transfer will be the only remaining option. Being one of the most reliable and versatile flaps used for microsurgical reconstruction, the free latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap provides an adequate solution to this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our experience with 12 consecutive patients who underwent the free transfer of LD free flap for secondary reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum following pelvic exenteration for management of locally advanced pelvic malignancies in Klinikum Oldenburg from 2007 to 2014. RESULTS: Recurrent cancer of the anal canal was the most common pathology necessitating the performance of pelvic exenteration. Thrombosis of the vascular anastomosis was reported in two cases and ended with total flap loss in one of them. Functional limitations arose in two patients postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 25 days. CONCLUSION: Free LD myocutaneous flap provides an adequate solution for reconstruction of pelvic defects resulting from radical oncological resections in cases where the use of locoregional flaps, such as the gluteus maximus flap and the vertical rectus abdominis flap, is not feasible because of an extensive defect, disruption of the vascular pedicle, or due to planning for bilateral stomas placement.
INTRODUCTION:Pelvic floor defects following pelvic exenteration constitute a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Whenever the common reconstruction options such as the gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap (GLM) and the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM) are not feasible, free tissue transfer will be the only remaining option. Being one of the most reliable and versatile flaps used for microsurgical reconstruction, the free latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap provides an adequate solution to this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our experience with 12 consecutive patients who underwent the free transfer of LD free flap for secondary reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum following pelvic exenteration for management of locally advanced pelvic malignancies in Klinikum Oldenburg from 2007 to 2014. RESULTS: Recurrent cancer of the anal canal was the most common pathology necessitating the performance of pelvic exenteration. Thrombosis of the vascular anastomosis was reported in two cases and ended with total flap loss in one of them. Functional limitations arose in two patients postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 25 days. CONCLUSION: Free LD myocutaneous flap provides an adequate solution for reconstruction of pelvic defects resulting from radical oncological resections in cases where the use of locoregional flaps, such as the gluteus maximus flap and the vertical rectus abdominis flap, is not feasible because of an extensive defect, disruption of the vascular pedicle, or due to planning for bilateral stomas placement.
Authors: Nicola C Petrie; James K K Chan; Helen Chave; Caroline N McGuiness Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Caprice K Christian; Mary R Kwaan; Rebecca A Betensky; Elizabeth M Breen; Michael J Zinner; Ronald Bleday Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Marcus J D Wagstaff; Warren M Rozen; Iain S Whitaker; Morteza Enajat; Thorir Audolfsson; Rafael Acosta Journal: Microsurgery Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.425