Literature DB >> 8513242

Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential.

P Praamstra1, D F Stegeman.   

Abstract

We report 3 experiments exploring the responsiveness of the auditory N400 event-related potential to the phonological relations between word or non-word targets and preceding prime words. When subjects had to decide whether primes and targets rhymed, non-rhyming words produced greater negativity in the N400 time range than rhyming words. The same effect was obtained when these targets were spoken by another voice than the prime words, suggesting that the effect is determined by phonological factors, and not merely by a physical-acoustic mismatch (Experiment 1). In the rhyming task, the differential N400 for non-rhyming vs. rhyming words was equally pronounced for non-rhyming vs. rhyming non-words (Experiment 2). In a lexical decision task on the same stimuli, a difference between non-rhyming and rhyming targets was obtained for words, but not for non-words (Experiment 3). The results show that the auditory N400 is sensitive to phonological variables. It is further proposed that phonological effects on the auditory N400 are not manifestations unique to phonological processes that demand conscious attention, but may also reflect operations that are performed automatically during auditory word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8513242     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(93)90013-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  26 in total

1.  Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Christian Obermeier; Sonja A Kotz; Sarah Jessen; Tim Raettig; Martin von Koppenfels; Winfried Menninghaus
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.

Authors:  M Martín-Loeches; S R Schweinberger; W Sommer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

3.  Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Gregory Spray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: a behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Matching heard and seen speech: An ERP study of audiovisual word recognition.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker; Courtney Rowland
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Right and left perisylvian cortex and left inferior frontal cortex mediate sentence-level rhyme detection in spoken language as revealed by sparse fMRI.

Authors:  Martina A Hurschler; Franziskus Liem; Lutz Jäncke; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Ryan C N D'Arcy; John F Connolly; Elisabet Service; Colin S Hawco; Michael E Houlihan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Applauding with closed hands: neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects.

Authors:  Pia Aravena; Esteban Hurtado; Rodrigo Riveros; Juan Felipe Cardona; Facundo Manes; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does Discourse Congruence Influence Spoken Language Comprehension before Lexical Association? Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Peter C Gordon; Debra Long; Lara Polse; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-25

10.  Effects of rhyme and spelling patterns on auditory word ERPs depend on selective attention to phonology.

Authors:  Yuliya N Yoncheva; Urs Maurer; Jason D Zevin; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.