Literature DB >> 8512761

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.

G Fowler1, J Webster, D Lyons, K Witte, W A Crichton, T A Jeffers, E A Wickham, S S Sanghera, R Cornish, J C Petrie.   

Abstract

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine vs enalapril as monotherapy was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe hypertension (supine DBP 105-125 mm Hg, SBP 140-220 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks placebo treatment 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (15 patients) 5-10 mg, or enalapril (16 patients) 5-20 mg for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 177 to 152 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 169 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -22.1, 0.3, P = 0.06) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Clinic supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 110 to 93 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 109-102 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -17.7, -2.7, P < 0.01) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure was greater for the amlodipine treated group, the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (5), peripheral oedema (3), upper respiratory infection (3) and anxiety (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril treated patients were headache (6), dizziness (3) and upper respiratory infection (2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8512761      PMCID: PMC1381687          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  23 in total

1.  The efficacy and safety of amlodipine in the treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  J Varrone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Multicenter placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  B de Bruijn; G Cocco; H M Tyler
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Once daily amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J Webster; O J Robb; T A Jeffers; A K Scott; J C Petrie; H M Towler
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

Authors:  W H Frishman; R Brobyn; R D Brown; B F Johnson; R L Reeves; D G Wombolt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  A double-blind evaluation of the effect of amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  W J Mroczek; J F Burris; K S Allenby
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J F Burris; R P Ames; W B Applegate; C V Ram; M E Davidov; W J Mroczek
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Long-term open evaluation of amlodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  B A Rofman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.

Authors:  D R Taves
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Treated blood pressure, rather than pretreatment, predicts survival in hypertensive patients. A report from the DHSS Hypertension Care Computing Project (DHCCP).

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; D G Beevers; A Butler; E C Coles; A E Fletcher; D Hunt; A D Munro-Faure; R Newson; P W O'Riordan; J C Petrie
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  A dose-response study of amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  M H Frick; D McGibney; H M Tyler
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for determination of amlodipine in plasma.

Authors:  K Matalka; T El-Thaher; M Saleem; T Arafat; A Jehanli; A Badwan
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.