Literature DB >> 2467116

A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

W H Frishman1, R Brobyn, R D Brown, B F Johnson, R L Reeves, D G Wombolt.   

Abstract

Amlodipine, a new long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was compared with placebo and atenolol in 125 patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-114 mm Hg]. Patients received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a random allocation to an 8-week double-blind, once-daily treatment with amlodipine (n = 41), atenolol (n = 43), or placebo (n = 41). The changes in 24-h post-dose blood pressure (BP) from baseline to final visit for amlodipine (mean daily dose 8.8 mg, range 5-10 mg) were -12.8 +/- 2.0/ -10.1 +/- 1.2 mm Hg in supine BP and -11.5 +/- 2.3/-9.8 +/- 1.1 mm Hg in standing BP (p less than 0.001); for atenolol (mean daily dose 83.7 mg, range 50-100 mg), the changes from baseline were -11.3 +/- 2.3/-11.7 +/- 1.3 mm Hg in supine BP and -13.3 +/- 3.1/-12.3 +/- 1.5 mm Hg in standing BP (p less than 0.001); for placebo, the changes from baseline were -0.9 +/- 2.8/-3.5 +/- 0.9 mm Hg in supine BP and -1.6 +/- -2.6/-4.0 +/- 1.0 mm Hg in standing BP. In the study, goal response was defined as a supine DBP of less than 90 mm Hg or its decrease by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. The response rates were similar for atenolol (65%) and amlodipine (61%). Both active therapies were significantly more effective than placebo. Heart rate was significantly lowered by atenolol only.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2467116     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198812007-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Pharmacologic treatment of chronic pediatric hypertension.

Authors:  Renee F Robinson; Milap C Nahata; Donald L Batisky; John D Mahan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.

Authors:  G Fowler; J Webster; D Lyons; K Witte; W A Crichton; T A Jeffers; E A Wickham; S S Sanghera; R Cornish; J C Petrie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.