Literature DB >> 8509853

Value of dobutamine technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT and echocardiography in the detection of coronary artery disease compared with coronary angiography.

B Günalp1, B Dokumaci, C Uyan, E Vardareli, E Işik, H Bayhan, M Ozgüven, E Oztürk.   

Abstract

The value of dobutamine echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging was evaluated as a noninvasive diagnostic method for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-seven patients who underwent coronary angiography were submitted to two separate injections of 99mTc-sestamibi, one under control conditions and the other after reaching a peak dobutamine infusion rate. Simultaneous ECG and echocardiographic monitoring was also performed during stepwise dobutamine infusion. Whereas the overall sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine sestamibi SPECT imaging were 94% and 88%, these values for dobutamine ECG and echocardiography were 61%, 55% and 84%, 88%, respectively. When dobutamine echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging were evaluated together, the diagnostic accuracy reaches almost 100%. Dobutamine echocardiography is of value in determining ischemic threshold earlier than clinical symptoms and allows simultaneous evaluation of ventricular performance and contractile function associated with perfusion abnormalities on 99,Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. Our experience shows that 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging, when combined with dobutamine echocardiography, is a safe, practical, well tolerated method with high diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8509853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Y Loong; C Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin as a prognostic agent?

Authors:  Ichiro Matsunari; Junichi Taki; Kenichi Nakajima; Norihisa Tonami
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Head-to-head comparison of exercise stress testing, pharmacologic stress echocardiography, and perfusion tomography as first-line examination for chest pain in patients without history of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G M Santoro; R Sciagrà; P Buonamici; N Consoli; V Mazzoni; F Zerauschek; G Bisi; P F Fazzini
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  A consideration of current clinical options for stress imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography versus quantitative technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT for detecting residual stenosis and multivessel disease after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P Lancellotti; T Benoit; P Rigo; L A Pierard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J A San Román; I Vilacosta; J A Castillo; M J Rollán; M Hernández; V Peral; I Garcimartín; M M de la Torre; F Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Altered myocardial perfusion during dobutamine stress testing in silent versus symptomatic myocardial ischaemia assessed by quantitative MIBI SPET imaging.

Authors:  A Elhendy; M L Geleijnse; J R Roelandt; J H Cornel; R T van Domburg; A E Reijs; P R Nierop; P M Fioretti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10

Review 10.  Stress echocardiogaphy: a useful test for assessing cardiac risk in diabetes.

Authors:  Rajan Sharma; Denis Pellerin
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.