Literature DB >> 8507310

Technical issues: test application. AAMC.

J A Colliver1, R G Williams.   

Abstract

Eighteen questions are posed that the authors believe address the major technical issues involved in the application of standardized patients (SPs). Following each question, selected empirical evidence and commentary are provided in response to the question and as background for further consideration of the issues. The authors conclude that the evidence from this large and systematic knowledge base about SP examinations is encouraging and should be cause for optimism. Moreover, it is noted that far less is known about the measurement properties of conventional procedures for clinical assessment in medical school courses and clerkships. The collective evidence from this extensive SP research base suggests that medical educators should move ahead to realize the benefits of the high-fidelity standardized approach provided by standardized-patient examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8507310     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  [First experiences in evaluating the clinical competence of family doctors in Catalonia].

Authors:  E Ruiz I Gil; E Florensa I Claramunt; J Cots I Yago; J Sellarès Salas; A Iruela López; C Blay Pueyo; R Morera Castell; J Martínez Carretero
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  The development of a 'Standardised Learner' in researching teaching behaviours.

Authors:  J Pitts; C Coles
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Standardized Patient's Views About their Role in the Teaching-Learning Process of Undergraduate Basic Science Medical Students.

Authors:  Pathiyil Ravi Shankar; Neelam Rekha Dwivedi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

4.  Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.

Authors:  J B Battles; S L Wilkinson; S J Lee
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

5.  An observational study comparing quality of care in walk-in centres with general practice and NHS Direct using standardised patients.

Authors:  Clare Grant; Ruth Nicholas; Laurence Moore; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

6.  Simulated learning in musculoskeletal assessment and rehabilitation education: comparing the effect of a simulation-based learning activity with a peer-based learning activity.

Authors:  Mark Hecimovich; Simone Volet
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.