Literature DB >> 27504312

Standardized Patient's Views About their Role in the Teaching-Learning Process of Undergraduate Basic Science Medical Students.

Pathiyil Ravi Shankar1, Neelam Rekha Dwivedi2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Standardized Patients (SPs) are widely used in medical education. SPs have a number of advantages but also have certain limitations. At the institution, SPs have been used since January 2013 for both teaching-learning and assessment during the basic science years of the undergraduate medical program. AIM: The present study was conducted to investigate the perception of SPs about various aspects of the program and obtain suggestions for further improvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted with a group of five SPs during the second week of November 2015. Respondents were explained the aims and objectives of the study and invited to participate. Written informed consent was obtained. The FGD was conducted using a discussion guide and was audio recorded. Various aspects of the SP program at the institution were discussed. Motivation/s for joining the program and suggestions for further improvement were obtained. Transcripts were created after listening to the recordings and were read through multiple times. Similar responses were coded. Items with similar codes were grouped together into themes.
RESULTS: Three respondents were female while two were male. The major advantage of SPs was their flexibility and ability to present a standardized response to the student. Students become familiar and comfortable with SPs. However, as a SP is simulating an illness s/he may not always be able to do complete justice to the role. The process used by SPs to prepare themselves to portray various diseases was highlighted. The use of SPs both during teaching-learning and assessment was also discussed. Some SPs are trained to provide feedback to students. Most SPs joined the program based on invitations from their friends who were already SPs. Challenges in recruiting SPs in a small island were discussed. Suggestions for further improvement were obtained.
CONCLUSION: The present study obtained the perception of SPs regarding various aspects of the SP program at the institution. The overall opinion of SPs was positive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Caribbean; Medical education; Medical students

Year:  2016        PMID: 27504312      PMCID: PMC4963672          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18827.7944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  15 in total

1.  Standardized patients in the early acquisition of clinical skills.

Authors:  R C McGraw; H M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Simulated patients' perspectives of and perceived role in medical students' professional identity development.

Authors:  Michelle McLean; Patricia Johnson; Sally Sargeant; Patricia Green
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  Teaching medical students how to break bad news with standardized patients.

Authors:  John V Kiluk; Sophie Dessureault; Gwendolyn Quinn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  A national survey to explore the willingness of Japanese standardized patients to participate in teaching physical examination skills to undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Keiko Abe; Tomio Suzuki; Kazuhiki Fujisaki; Nobutaro Ban
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 5.  Teaching medical students about disability: the use of standardized patients.

Authors:  Linda M Long-Bellil; Kenneth L Robey; Catherine L Graham; Paula M Minihan; Suzanne C Smeltzer; Paul Kahn
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jan-Joost Rethans; Frans J M Grosfeld; Leen Aper; Jan Reniers; Judith H Westen; Jacqueline J van Wijngaarden; Evelyn M van Weel-Baumgarten
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003.

Authors:  Graceanne Adamo
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 8.  Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lonneke Bokken; Tim Linssen; Albert Scherpbier; Cees van der Vleuten; Jan-Joost Rethans
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 9.  Technical issues: test application. AAMC.

Authors:  J A Colliver; R G Williams
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 10.  An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC.

Authors:  H S Barrows
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.