Literature DB >> 8506653

Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control.

H R Wilson1, R Humanski.   

Abstract

Spatial frequency adaptation is shown to cause a decrease in the exponent of the power law describing contrast increment thresholds. Next we show that spatial frequency adaptation produces almost no threshold elevation at a 30 msec test duration but a normal threshold elevation at 500 msec. Control experiments rule out an explanation in terms of sustained and transient mechanisms. Together these results show that spatial frequency adaptation cannot result from neuronal fatigue. The data can be explained by a contrast gain control network in which unit responses provide feedback signals that divide input contrast. Adaptation is hypothesized to produce an increase in the strength of this divisive feedback via temporary synaptic modification. A simple network model fits the data and also predicts both the magnitude and temporal dependence of the tilt aftereffect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8506653     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90248-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo.

Authors:  M V Sanchez-Vives; L G Nowak; D A McCormick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1.

Authors:  William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Short-term memory for scenes with affective content.

Authors:  Vera Maljkovic; Paolo Martini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Dynamic contrast change produces rapid gain control in visual cortex.

Authors:  N A Crowder; M A Hietanen; N S C Price; C W G Clifford; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Jongsoo Baek; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-06-16

9.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Contrast adaptation contributes to contrast-invariance of orientation tuning of primate V1 cells.

Authors:  Lionel G Nowak; Pascal Barone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.