Literature DB >> 8505355

Human morphology: its role in the mechanics of movement.

R K Jensen1.   

Abstract

Growth across the lifespan of males and females produces change in the form and structure of the human body which must be recognized in biomechanical models. The different morphologies for age span, gender and racial groupings have been identified and quantified by anthropometrists working primarily with measuring sticks and tapes. These parameters are not the parameters used to solve the dynamics problems of human movement. Models of the body composed of joints and rigid links have been formed and the inertial properties of the segments are required. The research which has been conducted to estimate these segment inertias is incomplete, dispersed, often flawed and inconclusive. However, it is essential that we have a reasonable understanding of the differences in inertia between individuals and changes of inertia within the individual regardless of age, sex and race. Segment inertia parameters can provide valuable insight into growth and the differences between individuals and populations. Segment morphology ranges from embryonic to excessive and each stage of growth or development has potential for the investigation of relationships between shape, size, inertia, weight and movement. The purpose of this paper is to examine research into segment inertias which provides useful information about the differences and changes to be expected. Although some guidance is provided, particularly with respect to bench mark studies, the paper is not intended as a discussion of methodologies. The studies which are pertinent to changes and differences in inertia make it clear that there are many interesting differences between age spans and, within these, differences between males and females and between races. If, in place of the expediency of proportions, segment parameters were measured and integrated into all studies, we would have a more complete representation of morphological changes and differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8505355     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90081-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

Review 1.  The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report.

Authors:  D J Pearsall; J G Reid
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A three-dimensional model of the shoulder girdle. Forces developed in deltoid and supraspinatus muscles during abduction.

Authors:  M Scepi; J-P Faure; N Ridoux; P Kamina; J-P Richer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography.

Authors:  D J Pearsall; J G Reid; L A Livingston
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Muscle mass in musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Dinesh K Pai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Quantitative estimation of muscle mass in older adults at risk of sarcopenia using ultrasound: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xinyi Tang; Li Huang; Jirong Yue; Li Qiu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

6.  Morphometrics and inertial properties in the body segments of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Kirsten Schoonaert; Kristiaan D'Août; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Growth of segment parameters and a morphological classification for children between 15 and 36 months.

Authors:  M Van Dam; A Hallemans; P Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.