Literature DB >> 8678352

Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography.

D J Pearsall1, J G Reid, L A Livingston.   

Abstract

This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to determine in vivo mass, center of mass (CM), and moments of inertia (Icm) about the CM of discrete segments of the human torso. Four subjects, two males and two females, underwent serial transverse CT scans that were collected at 1-cm intervals for the full length of the trunk. The pixel intensity values of transverse images were correlated to tissue densities, thereby allowing trunk section mass properties to be calculated. The percentage of body mass observed by vertebral levels ranged from 1.1% at T1 to 2.6% at L5. The masses of the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments as percentages of body mass were estimated to be 18.5, 12.2, and 10.7%, respectively. The whole trunk mass was estimated to comprise 41.6% of the total body mass. Transverse vertebral CM values were found to lie anterior to their respective vertebral centroids by up to 5.0 cm in the lower thoracic region. For the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments, the average CM positions were found to be 25.9, 62.5, and 86.9% of the distance from the superior to inferior ends of the trunk. The upper and middle trunk CMs corresponded to approximately 4.0 cm anterior to T7/T8 vertebral centroid levels and 1.0 cm anterior to L3/L4 vertebral centroid levels, respectively. For the whole trunk, the CM was 52.7% of the distance from the xiphoid process and approximately 2.0 cm anterior to L1/L2 vertebral centroid levels. Variations in CM and Icm values were observed between subject, but these were within the range of previous reports of body segment parameters. Differences from previous studies were attributable to variations in boundary definitions, measurement techniques, population groups, and body states (live versus cadaver) examined. The disparity between previous findings and findings of this study emphasizes the need to better define the segmental properties of the trunk so that improved biomechanical representation of the body can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678352     DOI: 10.1007/bf02667349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  23 in total

Review 1.  The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report.

Authors:  D J Pearsall; J G Reid
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Form and function of the erect human spine.

Authors:  E ASMUSSEN; K KLAUSEN
Journal:  Clin Orthop       Date:  1962

3.  The evaluation of mass densities of human body in vivo from CT scans.

Authors:  H K Huang; S C Wu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  The abdominal muscles and vertebral stability.

Authors:  K M Tesh; J S Dunn; J H Evans
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity relatated to posture and loading.

Authors:  G B Andersson; R Ortengren; P Herberts
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Standardised trunk asymmetry scores. A study of back contour in healthy school children.

Authors:  R G Burwell; N J James; F Johnson; J K Webb; Y G Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-08

7.  Physical properties of the human trunk as determined by computed tomography.

Authors:  J G Reid
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Evaluation of cross-sectional geometry and mass density distributions of humans and laboratory animals using computerized tomography.

Authors:  H K Huang; F R Suarez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The composition of body tissues.

Authors:  H Q Woodard; D R White
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The application of segment axial density profiles to a human body inertia model.

Authors:  C Wei; R K Jensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  29 in total

1.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Development and Validation of a Musculoskeletal Model of the Fully Articulated Thoracolumbar Spine and Rib Cage.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Reliability of the elliptical zone method of estimating body segment parameters of swimmers.

Authors:  Ross H Sanders; Chuang-Yuan Chiu; Tomohiro Gonjo; Jacki Thow; Nuno Oliveira; Stelios G Psycharakis; Carl J Payton; Carla B McCabe
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  A new method to include the gravitational forces in a finite element model of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Éric Aubin; Nadine Lalonde; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Biomechanical analysis of Ponte and pedicle subtraction osteotomies for the surgical correction of kyphotic deformities.

Authors:  Giuditta Salvi; Carl-Eric Aubin; Franck Le Naveaux; Xiaoyu Wang; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The effect of obesity and gender on body segment parameters in older adults.

Authors:  April J Chambers; Alison L Sukits; Jean L McCrory; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.