Literature DB >> 8504074

Functional effects of a G to U base change at position 530 in a highly conserved loop of Escherichia coli 16S RNA.

M Santer1, U Santer, K Nurse, A Bakin, P Cunningham, M Zain, D O'Connell, J Ofengand.   

Abstract

Any base change at position 530 introduced into Escherichia coli on a multicopy plasmid leads to cell death [Powers & Noller (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 1042-1046]. It was suggested that these mutants cannot carry out chain elongation. To define more precisely the function of base 530, we have studied ribosomes in which G530 was mutated to U530. In vivo, U530 16S rRNA was incorporated into 30S subunits and could combine with 50S to make 70S ribosomes. 16S rRNA in vitro transcripts containing U530 were assembled into 30S ribosomes, and their activity was tested in defined steps of protein synthesis. Mutant 30S ribosomes were as active as wild-type in poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis, P- and A-site tRNA binding, and 30S initiation complex formation. 30S initiation complexes, in the presence of 50S, could react with puromycin like the wild-type. The rate, extent, and position of cross-linking of AcVal-tRNA in the P site to 16S RNA were identical in mutant and wild-type ribosomes. Although there appeared to be no defect in 70S initiation complex formation or in direct A-site binding of Phe-tRNA dependent on poly(U), U530 30S ribosomes were nevertheless defective in carrying out synthesis of fMet-Val dipeptide using natural mRNA. Mutant 30S ribosomes were also refractory to streptomycin-induced misreading although no misreading was observed in its absence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8504074     DOI: 10.1021/bi00072a007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Testing constraints on rRNA bases that make nonsequence-specific contacts with the codon-anticodon complex in the ribosomal A site.

Authors:  Dwayne L Taliaferro; Philip J Farabaugh
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  The single pseudouridine residue in Escherichia coli 16S RNA is located at position 516.

Authors:  A Bakin; J A Kowalak; J A McCloskey; J Ofengand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Positions 13 and 914 in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA are involved in the control of translational accuracy.

Authors:  R Pinard; M Côté; C Payant; L Brakier-Gingras
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Chloroplast ribosomes and protein synthesis.

Authors:  E H Harris; J E Boynton; N W Gillham
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  16S ribosomal RNA pseudouridine synthase RsuA of Escherichia coli: deletion, mutation of the conserved Asp102 residue, and sequence comparison among all other pseudouridine synthases.

Authors:  J Conrad; L Niu; K Rudd; B G Lane; J Ofengand
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Mapping of the 13 pseudouridine residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae small subunit ribosomal RNA to nucleotide resolution.

Authors:  A Bakin; J Ofengand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Selection of small peptides, inhibitors of translation.

Authors:  Beatriz Llano-Sotelo; Dorota Klepacki; Alexander S Mankin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Ensemble cryo-EM elucidates the mechanism of translation fidelity.

Authors:  Anna B Loveland; Gabriel Demo; Nikolaus Grigorieff; Andrei A Korostelev
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Antibiotic drugs targeting bacterial RNAs.

Authors:  Weiling Hong; Jie Zeng; Jianping Xie
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.413

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.