Literature DB >> 8501665

Physicians' attitudes to the autopsy.

A Harris1, I Ismail, S Dilly, J D Maxwell.   

Abstract

The overall autopsy rate (excluding coroner's autopsies) at a large teaching district general hospital over a four year period was 16.5%, but individual rates for ten general physicians varied from 5% to 35%. During this period, the mean autopsy rate for general medicine (14%) was significantly lower than rates for cardiology (21%), geriatrics (23%) and paediatrics (36%), but similar to general surgery (13%). Autopsies were widely perceived as being of benefit to education and research, but physicians were often unaware of their value for confirming the diagnosis and for clinical audit, and over-estimated their actual autopsy rates on average by 50%. High rates (18-30%) were associated with consultants who had a definite policy regarding autopsies and had made this clear to their junior staff. Low rates (6-10%) obtained where there was no consultant policy on autopsies, and were frequently attributed by the consultant physicians to failure by their junior staff. Physicians should be more aware of the value of autopsies, and should take responsibility for increasing and monitoring autopsy requests to improve clinical audit, quality assurance and medical education.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8501665      PMCID: PMC5396636     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  11 in total

1.  Necropsy rates in the United Birmingham Hospitals.

Authors:  H A Waldron; L Vickerstaff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-05-10

2.  NCEPOD strikes again.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Auditing necropsies.

Authors:  I Lauder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-16

4.  Future of the hospital autopsy.

Authors:  H M Cameron
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1988-11

Review 5.  Assessing the autopsy.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; J Ludwig; L T Kurland
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  A symposium on the autopsy.

Authors:  R Yesner; M J Robinson; L Goldman; C M Reichert; L Engel
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1985

7.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clinical attitudes to the autopsy.

Authors:  E McGoogan; H M Cameron
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 0.729

9.  Factors which influence necropsy requests: a psychological approach.

Authors:  R D Start; M J Hector-Taylor; D W Cotton; M Startup; M A Parsons; A Kennedy
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The autopsy, past and present.

Authors:  H M Cameron
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1984-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinician beliefs underlying autopsy requests.

Authors:  K S Birdi; D J Bunce; R D Start; D W Cotton
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  The use of histopathology in the practice of necropsy.

Authors:  J O Williams; M J Goddard; G A Gresham; B A Wyatt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A survey of general practitioners' views on autopsy reports.

Authors:  S Karunaratne; E W Benbow
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Public perceptions of necropsy.

Authors:  R D Start; C A Saul; D W Cotton; N J Mathers; J C Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Hospital autopsy: Endangered or extinct?

Authors:  Angus Turnbull; Michael Osborn; Nick Nicholas
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.