Literature DB >> 850064

Recall of specific suppression: co-dominance of suppression after primary or secondary antigen stimulation.

D D Eardley, E E Sercarz.   

Abstract

Mouse spleen cells primed in vivo with beta-galactosidase (GZ), and cultured in vitro with trinitrophenyl beta-galactosidase (TNP-GZ), make a very poor anti-TNP response compared to cultures of normal spleen cells. The lack of response is caused by active suppression as indicated by cell mixture experiments. At 2-months following priming, while the helper effect predominates, suppression can be recalled by rechallenge of the mice with GZ. Both primary suppression (after a single injection) and secondary suppression (after two injections) reduce the response of normal or carrier-primed helper cells at equivalent cell ratios in mixture experiments. Both kinds of suppression are carrier specific, slectively suppress high avidity antibody production, and require cell division to suppress the response of normal cells. The only difference between primary and secondary suppression is that primary suppression is obliterated in cultures which are not challenged with antigen until 24 hr after cultures are established. Secondary suppression is still observed when cultures receive TNP-GZ at 24 hr. Suppression appears to be an early component of both primary and secondary responses. The regulatory function of such suppression may be the delay of antibody secretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 850064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  8 in total

1.  Key antigenic determinants in regulation of the immune response.

Authors:  D Turkin; E E Sercarz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of irradiation on the precursor, activated and memory suppressor T cells for delayed-type hypersensitivity to sheep erythrocytes in mice.

Authors:  H K Gill; J S Dhaliwal; K D Sukumaran; F Y Liew
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Memory suppressor T cells in latent Japanese encephalitis virus infection.

Authors:  A Mathur; R Kulshreshtha; S Rawat; U C Chaturvedi
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Induction and mode of action of suppressor cells generated against human gamma globulin. II. Effects of colchicine.

Authors:  D E Parks; D A Shaller; W O Weigle
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  The involvement of suppressor T cells in Ir gene regulation of secondary antibody responses of primed (responder X nonresponder)F1 mice to macrophage-bound L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine.

Authors:  R N Germain; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Effect of colchicine on the antibody response. II. Demonstration of the inactivation of suppressor cell activities by colchicine.

Authors:  P N Shek; C Waltenbaugh; A H Coons
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-04-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Effect of colchicine on the antibody response. I. Enhancement of antibody formation in mice.

Authors:  P N Shek; A H Coons
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-04-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Suppressor T cell memory. II. The role of memory suppressor T cells in tolerance to human gamma globulin.

Authors:  R H Loblay; B Fazekas de St Groth; H Pritchard-Briscoe; A Basten
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1983-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.