Literature DB >> 8499026

Undergraduate medical education.

L Rees1, J Wass.   

Abstract

Pressures from students and teachers, from professional bodies, and from changes in the way health care is delivered are all forcing a rethink of how medical students should be taught. These pressures may be more intense in London but are not confined to it. The recommendation the Tomlinson report advocates that has been generally welcomed is for more investment in primary care in London. General practitioners have much to teach medical schools about effective ways of learning, but incentives for teaching students in general practice are currently low, organising such teaching is difficult and needs resources, and resistance within traditional medical school hierarchies needs to be overcome. Likewise, students value learning within local communities, but the effort demanded of public health departments and community organisations is great at a time when they are under greater pressure than ever before. The arguments over research that favour concentration in four multifaculty schools are less clear cut for undergraduate education, where personal support for students is important. An immediate concern is that the effort demanded for reorganising along the lines suggested by Tomlinson will not leave medical schools much energy for innovating.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499026      PMCID: PMC1676746          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6872.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  All that is solid melts into air--the implications of community based undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Primary health care in London--changes since the Acheson report.

Authors:  B Jarman; N Bosanquet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

3.  London after Tomlinson. Clinical research.

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

4.  The physician scientist: an endangered but far from extinct species.

Authors:  D J Weatherall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-27

5.  Undergraduate medical education: the challenge of change.

Authors:  J D Knox
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The time has now arrived: a look at medical education.

Authors:  G B Newman
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students.

Authors:  D I Newble; K Jaeger
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.251

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  MRCGP pass rate by medical school and region of postgraduate training. Royal College of General Practitioners.

Authors:  R Wakeford; J Foulkes; C McManus; L Southgate
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-28

2.  Clinical teaching: past--present--future.

Authors:  F Gleeson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  A J Zuckerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.