Literature DB >> 8496200

Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening. Ultrasonography, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared.

K S Eyres1, M J Bell, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

We studied the quantity and rate of formation of new bone during lengthening of 17 limb segments in 10 patients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), ultrasonography and radiography. Whereas new bone was detected by both DEXA and ultrasonography within 1 to 2 weeks of distraction, it was not visible on the radiographs until 4 to 8 weeks. Limb alignment and gap measurement were accurately assessed by DEXA without the need for standard radiographs or scanograms. With ultrasound the distraction gap appeared as an echolucent window which narrowed progressively producing a hyper-reflecting line after which further consolidation could not be assessed. As measured by DEXA the density of the new bone at this stage was approximately 45% of control values and did not represent normal cortication. Whereas ultrasound could be used to identify defects in mineralisation and to determine when to dynamise the fixator system, DEXA could measure the quantity and rate of formation of bone throughout lengthening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496200     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  19 in total

1.  Transport distraction osteogenesis for maxillomandibular reconstruction: current concepts and applications.

Authors:  R S Neelakandan; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

2.  Objective guidelines for removing an external fixator after tibial lengthening using pixel value ratio: a pilot study.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Qing Fan; K P Venkatesh; Man S Park; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Quantitative assessment of mineralization in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sunit Hazra; Hae-Ryong Song; Sandeep Biswal; Suk-Ha Lee; Seok Hyun Lee; Ki-Mo Jang; Hitesh N Modi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Noninvasive quantitative assessment of bone healing after distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Oladapo M Babatunde; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-08-18

5.  Prediction of Callus Subsidence in Distraction Osteogenesis Using Callus Formation Scoring System: Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Panlop Tirawanish; Perajit Eamsobhana
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry predicts bone formation in lower limb callotasis lengthening.

Authors:  N Maffulli; J C Cheng; A Sher; T P Lam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  DEXA as a predictor of fixator removal in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Assessment of distraction callus in rabbits by monitoring of the electrical impedance of bone.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshida; Wook-Cheol Kim; Yoshinobu Oka; Naotake Yamada; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Qualitative assesement of newly formed bone after distraction osteogenesis of mandible in patients with facial asymmetry using 3 dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Abhay Datarkar; Bhavana Valvi; Suraj Parmar; Jagadish Patil
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-03-26

10.  Can the material properties of regenerate bone be predicted with non-invasive methods of assessment? Exploring the correlation between dual X-ray absorptiometry and compression testing to failure in an animal model of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Fergal Monsell; Andrew William Hughes; James Turner; Michael C Bellemore; Lynne Bilston
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.