Literature DB >> 9244066

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry predicts bone formation in lower limb callotasis lengthening.

N Maffulli1, J C Cheng, A Sher, T P Lam.   

Abstract

The rate of regenerate bone mineral content (BMC) acceleration was studied using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in callotasis lengthening of the lower limb. Eleven youngsters (age range 5-17 years) undergoing callotasis lengthening for congenital, post-traumatic or post-infective conditions were studied longitudinally. Patients were initially scanned once a week until completion of the lengthening phase, and at 2-week intervals thereafter until removal of the fixator. They were subsequently followed up at regular intervals on an outpatient basis for up to 2 years after removal of the fixator (average, 14 months). The BMC accretion slopes exhibited by the patients and the rate of new bone formation allowed the identification of three groups. In the fast formation group, the rate of new bone formation was 0.3-0.6% per day. In the moderate formation group the rate of new bone formation is 0.1-0.3% per day, while in the poor formation group the rate of new bone formation is < 0.1% per day. From the analysis of time graphs, a direct correlation emerged between early bone formation and subsequent bone mineral content accretion. Measurement of BMC during callotasis lengthening in the lower limb allows precise monitoring of the process. It may prove useful to prevent complications occurring after removal of the fixator at an unduly early stage, such as plastic deformation and fracture through the regenerate bone. It may be used to predict the bone formation rate in a given patient, and to implement measures to try to influence it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9244066      PMCID: PMC2502829     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  21 in total

1.  A review of 240 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis for congenital post-traumatic or postinfective lower limb length discrepancy.

Authors:  N Maffulli; C Lombari; L Matarazzo; U Nele; G Pagnotta; J A Fixsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Current techniques of limb lengthening.

Authors:  D Paley
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis).

Authors:  G De Bastiani; R Aldegheri; L Renzi-Brivio; G Trivella
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  New bone formation during leg lengthening. Evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  K S Eyres; M J Bell; J A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-01

5.  Ultrasonography of postosteotomy "cysts".

Authors:  D J Chadha; H M Malde
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 6.  Imaging in bone lengthening. A review.

Authors:  T H Hughes; N Maffulli; V Green; J A Fixsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Measuring stiffness can define healing of tibial fractures.

Authors:  J B Richardson; J L Cunningham; A E Goodship; B T O'Connor; J Kenwright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

8.  Lengthening of congenital limb length discrepancy using callotasis: early experience of the Hospital for Sick Children.

Authors:  N Maffulli; R C Pattinson; J A Fixsen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Radiographic features of limb lengthening in children.

Authors:  I Minty; N Maffulli; T H Hughes; D G Shaw; J A Fixsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Reduction of radiation doses in leg lengthening procedures by means of audit and computed tomography scanogram techniques.

Authors:  C A Romanowski; A C Underwood; A Sprigg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  4 in total

1.  Noninvasive quantitative assessment of bone healing after distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Oladapo M Babatunde; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-08-18

Review 2.  The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Ze Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  DEXA as a predictor of fixator removal in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone lengthening osteogenesis, a combination of intramembranous and endochondral ossification: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Francisco Forriol; Luca Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Hirofumi Taira; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.