Literature DB >> 8494712

The use of tumour markers CEA, CA-195 and CA-242 in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

U Ward1, J N Primrose, P J Finan, T J Perren, P Selby, D A Purves, E H Cooper.   

Abstract

Tumour markers CEA, CA-195 and CA-242 were measured in 33 patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. The aim was to determine whether they could be used to accurately monitor the course of the disease, and reduce the need for imaging. Treatment with a 5-fluorouracil based regimen resulted in a partial response in nine patients (27%), whereas the remainder either had disease stabilisation or suffered from progression. Before treatment the CEA was elevated in 85% of patients and the CA-195 and CA-242 in 78%. All three markers were elevated in 70% and at least one elevated in 93%. CA-195 and CA-242 appeared to be co-expressed, by contrast with the CEA. When compared to the results of serial CT scanning the CEA correlated best with the course of the disease, the positive predictive value being 54% for a partial response, 77% for minor and partial responses combined and 100% for progressive disease. The corresponding values for CA-195 were 46%, 62% and 100% respectively and for CA-242, 50%, 67% and 100% respectively. Thus, although falling levels of markers overestimate the number of responses demonstrated by imaging, rising tumour markers invariably herald progressive disease. This was often evident up to 16 weeks before progression was observed on scanning. CEA is the most useful of the three markers in the monitoring of patients being treated for advanced colorectal cancer, but other markers may prove valuable if the CEA is normal. The use of tumour markers should reduce the need for regular scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8494712      PMCID: PMC1968452          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  11 in total

1.  Eighty-four potential second-look operations based on sequential carcinoembryonic antigen determinations and clinical investigations in patients with recurrent gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  H J Staab; F A Anderer; E Stumpf; A Hornung; R Fischer; G Kieninger
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Clinical update on the role of fluorouracil and recombinant interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Wadler; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: evidence of significant improvement of survival and quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  M A Poon; M J O'Connell; C G Moertel; H S Wieand; S A Cullinan; L K Everson; J E Krook; J A Mailliard; J A Laurie; L K Tschetter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Fluorouracil and recombinant alfa-2a-interferon: an active regimen against advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Wadler; E L Schwartz; M Goldman; A Lyver; M Rader; M Zimmerman; L Itri; V Weinberg; P H Wiernik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Results of a 400-patient carcinoembryonic antigen second-look colorectal cancer study.

Authors:  J P Minton; J L Hoehn; D M Gerber; J S Horsley; D P Connolly; F Salwan; W S Fletcher; A B Cruz; F G Gatchell; M Oviedo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Significance of a fall in serum CEA concentration in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for disseminated colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T G Allen-Mersh; N Kemeny; D Niedzwiecki; B Shurgot; J M Daly
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The value of CA 19-9 in gastric and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Safi; R Bittner; R Roscher; R Kübel; H G Beger
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Prospective monitoring trial for carcinoma of colon and rectum after surgical resection.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; M Llaneras; T Martin; D Kaiser
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-12

9.  The tumour marker CA 195 in colorectal and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P M Sagar; O M Taylor; E H Cooper; E A Benson; M J McMahon; P J Finan
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of CA242 in gastro-intestinal cancer. A comparison with CEA, CA50 and CA 19-9.

Authors:  O Nilsson; C Johansson; B Glimelius; B Persson; B Nørgaard-Pedersen; A Andrén-Sandberg; L Lindholm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Biomarkers: Going Beyond the Carcinoembryonic Antigen.

Authors:  Nicole E Lopez; Carrie Y Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  The role of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M F Mulcahy; A B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Are serial measurements of CA19-9 useful in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas?

Authors:  H Gogas; F J Lofts; T R Evans; S Daryanani; J L Mansi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Threshold Change in CEA as a Predictor of Non-Progression to First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Elevated CEA.

Authors:  Pat Gulhati; Jun Yin; Levi Pederson; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Paulo Hoff; Jean-Yves Douillard; J Randolph Hecht; Christophe Tournigand; Niall Tebbut; Benoist Chibaudel; Aimery De Gramont; Qian Shi; Michael James Overman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  CEA Response and Depth of Response (DpR) to Predict Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Cetuximab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Sunakawa; Akihito Tsuji; Tadamichi Denda; Yoshihiko Segawa; Yuji Negoro; Ken Shimada; Mitsugu Kochi; Masato Nakamura; Masahito Kotaka; Hiroaki Tanioka; Akinori Takagane; Satoshi Tani; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Takanori Watanabe; Masahiro Takeuchi; Masashi Fujii; Wataru Ichikawa
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Plasma glycoprotein profiling for colorectal cancer biomarker identification by lectin glycoarray and lectin blot.

Authors:  Yinghua Qiu; Tasneem H Patwa; Li Xu; Kerby Shedden; David E Misek; Missy Tuck; Gracie Jin; Mack T Ruffin; Danielle K Turgeon; Sapna Synal; Robert Bresalier; Norman Marcon; Dean E Brenner; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Circulating blood group related carbohydrate antigens as tumour markers.

Authors:  T F Orntoft; E Bech
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.916

8.  Tumor marker evolution: comparison with imaging for assessment of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Eduardo Flores; Michel Ducreux; Francis Lévi; Bernard Paule; Daniel Azoulay; Denis Castaing; Antoinette Lemoine; René Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen for monitoring tumor progression during palliative chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gangmi Kim; Eun-Joo Jung; Chun-Geun Ryu; Dae-Yong Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in monitoring palliative treatment response of patients with gastrointestinal tumours.

Authors:  G Kornek; T Schenk; M Raderer; M Djavarnmad; W Scheithauer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.