Literature DB >> 8493422

A survey of monitoring practices in cancer clinical trials.

S L George1.   

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a survey of data monitoring practices of the 12 clinical co-operative groups in cancer sponsored by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Most of these co-operative groups conduct a large number of active clinical trials in a wide variety of cancers. The number of active phase III trials in 1991 was 244 with nearly 24,000 patients entered on these trials. The survey instrument used in this paper was modified from one originally developed by Geller and Stylianou, supplemented by questions on the responsibilities of data monitoring committees based on Hawkins. Topics covered included general policies and procedures on the monitoring of clinical trials in these groups as well as specific questions on the responsibilities and operational procedures of formal data monitoring committees. Although formal statistical stopping rules are almost always employed in cancer trials in these co-operative groups, use of a formal data monitoring committee is a relatively new, but increasing practice. For a variety of economic and practical reasons, the members of data monitoring committees for cancer trials are rarely independent of the study participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8493422     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780120507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Experiences and challenges in data monitoring for clinical trials within an international tropical disease research network.

Authors:  M Chen-Mok; M J VanRaden; E S Higgs; R Dominik
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Sharing interim trial results by the Data Safety Monitoring Board with those responsible for the trial's conduct and progress: a narrative review.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Survey of professional views on sharing interim results by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB): what to share, with whom and why.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; James Paul; Norman Buckley; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Exploring factors associated with views on sharing of certain interim trial result measures by the data safety monitoring board (DSMB) with non-DSMB members.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; James Paul; Norman Buckley; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.