Literature DB >> 8489385

Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis.

L L Fritts1, R Orlando.   

Abstract

To assess the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy, we reviewed hospital records and charge data for all patients older than age 15 years who underwent appendectomy between November 1990 and July 1992. Fifty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 206 patients underwent conventional appendectomy. Intraoperative (1.9%) and postoperative (5.8%) complication rates were low. The rate of conversion to conventional appendectomy was 7.7%. Hospital stay and charge analysis was performed on a cohort of 52 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy and 180 patients undergoing conventional appendectomy. Total costs were similar. The most notable difference between the two groups was the operating room supply charge; this negated any cost savings achieved by the reduced length of stay following laparoscopic appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe alternative to conventional appendectomy; it shortens hospital stay and allows patients to resume normal activity more quickly than conventional appendectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8489385     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170051007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  19 in total

1.  Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Karl J Sweeney; Mary Dillon; Sean M Johnston; Frank B Keane; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A contemporaneous comparison of hospital charges for laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  R Incarbone; J H Peters; J Heimbucher; D Dvorak; C G Bremner; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Hospital charges for Nissen fundoplication and other laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  K Apelgren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy--review of the first decade.

Authors:  J P McDermott; T F Gorey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a favorable opinion.

Authors:  D M Ota
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

8.  Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a reliable one-port procedure.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Lee; Hui-Ming Lee; Chih-Sung Hsieh; Jiin-Haur Chuang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution.

Authors:  F Paul Buckley; Hannah Vassaur; Sharon Monsivais; Daniel Jupiter; Rob Watson; John Eckford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Rossi; M Anselmino; M Costantini; S Pianalto; N Baldan; D Pizzato; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.