Literature DB >> 8488775

Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tip guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions.

P W Serruys1, C Di Mario, N Meneveau, P de Jaegere, S Strikwerda, P J de Feyter, H Emanuelsson.   

Abstract

The use of miniaturized pressure and velocity sensors mounted on angioplasty guidewires allows the simultaneous measurement of coronary blood flow velocity and transstenotic pressure gradient, 2 parameters that, combined, should perfectly characterize stenosis hemodynamics. The aim of this article is assessment of the changes in coronary blood flow velocity observed with a Doppler-tipped angioplasty guidewire in 35 patients undergoing balloon angioplasty. We also report our initial experience in 16 patients with the combined use of sensor-tip pressure and Doppler guidewires, and we discuss the application of new methodologic approaches for the study of the coronary circulation allowed by these techniques, such as the instantaneous assessment of the flow velocity/pressure and pressure gradient/flow velocity relations. Before and after angioplasty, flow velocity measurements were obtained distal to the stenosis, both in baseline conditions and after intracoronary injection of 8-12.5 mg of papaverine. The Doppler guidewire was left in place during the dilation procedure and the Doppler signal was continuously recorded during balloon inflation and after deflation to monitor the development of collateral flow, the restoration of flow after balloon deflation, the phase of postocclusive reactive hyperemia, and, incidently, the development of flow-limiting complications. Merits and pitfalls of several flow velocity parameters (average peak velocity, coronary flow velocity reserve, diastolic/systolic velocity ratio), as well as of parameters derived from the combination of pressure and velocity measurements (transstenotic pressure gradient/flow velocity relation and instantaneous diastolic hyperemic flow velocity/pressure relation) were evaluated in 35 patients with, and 37 without, significant coronary stenoses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8488775     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90133-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  The Achilles heel of SPECT imaging: the false-positive scans--or are they?

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  [Methods for coronary functional assessment].

Authors:  M Elsner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Current developments and future applications of intracoronary hemodynamics.

Authors:  Edward Coverstone; Robert Shapiro; Jasvindar Singh
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.439

4.  A Song of Pressure and Flow, or There and Back Again.

Authors:  James P Howard; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  Prevalence of microvascular disease in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Qian; J Ge; D Baumgart; S Sack; M Haude; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yingyi Geng; Xintong Wu; Haipeng Liu; Dingchang Zheng; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard.

Authors:  B R G Brueren; J M ten Berg; M J Suttorp; E T Bal; J M P G Ernst; E G Mast; H W M Plokker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Assessment of coronary microvascular resistance in the chronic infarcted pig heart.

Authors:  Stefan Koudstaal; Sanne J Jansen Of Lorkeers; Frebus J van Slochteren; Tycho I G van der Spoel; Tim P van de Hoef; Joost P Sluijter; Maria Siebes; Pieter A Doevendans; Jan J Piek; Steven A J Chamuleau
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements.

Authors:  Christopher M Cook; Allen Jeremias; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Guus de Waard; Tim van de Hoef; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Martijn van Lavieren; Rasha Al Lamee; Yuetsu Kikuta; Yasutsugu Shiono; Ashesh Buch; Martijn Meuwissen; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen; Akiko Maehara; Bon-Kwon Koo; Gary S Mintz; Javier Escaned; Gregg W Stone; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Jan J Piek; Niels van Royen; Justin E Davies
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 11.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.