Literature DB >> 8487521

Differences between stutterers' and nonstutterers' short-term recall and recognition performance.

H G Bosshardt1.   

Abstract

Longer rehearsal times presumably reduce the efficiency of rehearsal and, hence, of short-term recall. The present experiment examined the question as to whether the slower subvocalization rate of people who stutter is correlated with inferior short-term serial recall and recognition performance. Rate of overt articulation was taken as a measure of rehearsal time. Lists of four nonlexical CVC syllables were presented for short-term serial recall and for short-term recognition. Nineteen adults who stutter and 30 nonstutterers participated in the experiment. In the serial reproduction task the subjects who stuttered reproduced significantly fewer items correctly than did nonstutterers. Recognition performance was measured by nonparametric measures of sensitivity and bias as defined in signal detection theory. The stuttering subjects had a significantly lower sensitivity resulting primarily from a higher false alarm rate. Rate of overt articulation was significantly related to one measure of short-term recall but not to the sensitivity of recognition. These results were interpreted as suggesting that people who stutter have slower phonological encoding and rehearsal times, that they make less use of nonphonological forms of coding than do nonstutterers, and that within their phonological system, activation more easily spills over to similar items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8487521     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3602.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  8 in total

1.  Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich; Nancy E Hall
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.

Authors:  H G Bosshardt; C Sappok; M Knipschild; C Hölscher
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1997-07

3.  Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Kathryn Kreidler; Amanda Hampton Wray; Evan Usler; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Evan R Usler; Bridget Walsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Edward G Conture
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  From Grapheme to Phonological Output: Performance of Adults Who Stutter on a Word Jumble Task.

Authors:  Megann McGill; Harvey Sussman; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Nonword repetition in adults who stutter: The effects of stimuli stress and auditory-orthographic cues.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.