Literature DB >> 15212568

Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter.

Julie D Anderson1, Edward G Conture.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use an age-appropriate version of the sentence-structure priming paradigm (e.g., K. Bock, 1990; K. Bock, H. Loebell, and R. Morey, 1992) to assess experimentally the syntactic processing abilities of children who stutter (CWS) and children who do not stutter (CWNS). Participants were 16 CWS and 16 CWNS between the ages of 3;3 (years; months) and 5;5, matched for gender and age (+/-4 months). All participants had speech, language, and hearing development within normal limits, with the exception of stuttering for CWS. All children participated in a sentence-structure priming task where they were shown and asked to describe, on a computer screen, black-on-white line drawings of children, adults, and animals performing activities that could be appropriately described using simple active affirmative declarative (SAAD) sentences (e.g., "The man is walking the dog"). Speech reaction time (SRT) was measured from the onset of the picture presentation to the onset of the child's verbal response in the absence and presence of priming sentences, counterbalanced for order. Main findings indicated that CWS exhibited slower SRTs in the absence of priming sentences and greater syntactic-priming effects than CWNS. These findings suggest that CWS may have difficulty rapidly, efficiently planning and/or retrieving sentence-structure units, difficulties that may contribute to their inabilities to establish fluent speech-language production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15212568      PMCID: PMC1458370          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/043)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  47 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering.

Authors:  J S Yaruss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Language production abilities of children whose stuttering persisted or recovered.

Authors:  R V Watkins; E Yairi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cuadrado; Christine M Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfluency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers.

Authors:  W JOHNSON
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1961-06

Review 6.  A theory of neuropsycholinguistic function in stuttering.

Authors:  W H Perkins; R D Kent; R F Curlee
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

7.  Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency.

Authors:  N B Ratner; C C Sih
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-08

8.  Disfluencies of normally speaking two-year-old children.

Authors:  E Yairi
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-12

9.  Lexical priming in picture naming of young children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Mark W Pellowski; Edward G Conture
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Measuring lexical diversity in children who stutter: application of vocd.

Authors:  Stacy Silverman; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.538

View more
  30 in total

1.  Emotional reactivity, regulation and childhood stuttering: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Hayley S Arnold; Edward G Conture; Alexandra P F Key; Tedra Walden
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Spontaneous regulation of emotions in preschool children who stutter: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Kia N Johnson; Tedra A Walden; Edward G Conture; Jan Karrass
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Dual diathesis-stressor model of emotional and linguistic contributions to developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Tedra A Walden; Carl B Frankel; Anthony P Buhr; Kia N Johnson; Edward G Conture; Jan M Karrass
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2012-05

6.  Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Gregory Spray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Emotional reactivity and regulation associated with fluent and stuttered utterances of preschool-age children who stutter.

Authors:  Robin M Jones; Edward G Conture; Tedra A Walden
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in lexical priming of young children who stutter: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Kia N Hartfield; Edward G Conture
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Sentence position and syntactic complexity of stuttering in early childhood: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Anthony Buhr; Patricia Zebrowski
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.538

10.  Lexical priming of function words and content words with children who do, and do not, stutter.

Authors:  Ceri Savage; Peter Howell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.