Literature DB >> 8485969

Effects of non-response on estimates derived from an oral health survey of older adults.

D Locker1.   

Abstract

A major source of bias in health surveys is non-response on the part of those selected to take part in a study. In a survey of the oral health of older adults in Ontario, Canada, we used an initial telephone survey based on random digit dialing with a personal interview and clinical examination follow-up. The telephone survey was completed by 3033 individuals (78.0%) of those sampled. The follow-up was completed by only 907 (30.0%) of these subjects. Nevertheless, there were no major differences in the characteristics of those completing the telephone survey and those subsequently participating in the follow-up. Non-response bias analysis indicated that differences between crude and adjusted estimates of the prevalence of oral conditions were small and the effect of non-response on estimates of the relationship between socioeconomic status and oral health in this population were also small. These results indicate that response rates lower than those conventionally regarded as acceptable do not necessarily compromise the results of epidemiological studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8485969     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00731.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  6 in total

1.  Subgroups of refusers in a disability prevention trial in older adults: baseline and follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Christoph E Minder; Tobias Müller; Gerhard Gillmann; John C Beck; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Assessing the need for anesthesia and sedation services in Kuwaiti dental practice.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdulwahab; Fatima Al-Sayegh; Sean G Boynes; Hawra Abdulwahab; Jayme Zovko; John Close
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

3.  Assessing the oral health of an ageing population: methods, challenges and predictors of survey participation.

Authors:  Debora C Matthews; Martha G S Brillant; Joanne B Clovis; Mary E McNally; Mark J Filiaggi; Robert D Kotzer; Herenia P Lawrence
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Challenges and benefits of integrating diverse sampling strategies in the observation of cardiovascular risk factors (ORISCAV-LUX 2) study.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Jessica Pastore; Nicolas Sauvageot; Gwenaëlle Le Coroller; Valéry Bocquet; Marylène d'Incau; Gloria Aguayo; Brice Appenzeller; Dritan Bejko; Torsten Bohn; Laurent Malisoux; Sophie Couffignal; Stephanie Noppe; Charles Delagardelle; Jean Beissel; Anna Chioti; Saverio Stranges; Jean-Claude Schmit
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Cognitive vulnerability and dental fear.

Authors:  Jason M Armfield; Gary D Slade; A John Spencer
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  From a Bird's Eye View: Whole Social Networks in Adult Day Care Centers and Continuing Care Retirement Communities.

Authors:  Liat Ayalon; Inbal Yahav; Ofrit Lesser
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2018-09-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.