INTRODUCTION: Follow-up of individuals treated for a primary squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract is critical because of the high risk of development of either recurrent disease or a new primary tumor. A mail survey of physicians actively practicing head and neck surgery was undertaken. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiple-choice survey was distributed to 400 members of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery. Respondents indicated approach to post-treatment follow up. RESULTS: Surveys were returned from 290 members (73%). Routine monthly follow up is advocated by 73% of respondents during the first postoperative year. Patients are followed every 2 to 3 months in the second postoperative year by 90% of respondents. During postoperative years, 3 to 5 patients are seen every 4 to 6 months by 97% of respondents. All respondents see patients either semiannually or annually for the remainder of their lives. Sixty percent of respondents advocate annual screening chest radiographs, whereas 14% do not order routine chest radiographs. The overwhelming majority of respondents reserve barium swallow and computed tomographic (CT) scans for evaluation of symptomatic patients. Similarly, nuclear imaging is reserved for patients with specific symptoms or abnormal laboratory tests. Blood tests most frequently monitored include complete blood cell count (CBC) (43%), thyroid function test (22%), and liver function test (20%). Follow-up endoscopic evaluation under anesthesia is reserved for symptomatic patients by over 95% of respondents. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that head and neck surgeons rarely use supplemental studies other than chest radiograph during routine follow up. The authors speculate that routine chest radiograph may be valuable in screening for a second primary carcinoma. Techniques to screen for esophageal tumors remain contentious.
INTRODUCTION: Follow-up of individuals treated for a primary squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract is critical because of the high risk of development of either recurrent disease or a new primary tumor. A mail survey of physicians actively practicing head and neck surgery was undertaken. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiple-choice survey was distributed to 400 members of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery. Respondents indicated approach to post-treatment follow up. RESULTS: Surveys were returned from 290 members (73%). Routine monthly follow up is advocated by 73% of respondents during the first postoperative year. Patients are followed every 2 to 3 months in the second postoperative year by 90% of respondents. During postoperative years, 3 to 5 patients are seen every 4 to 6 months by 97% of respondents. All respondents see patients either semiannually or annually for the remainder of their lives. Sixty percent of respondents advocate annual screening chest radiographs, whereas 14% do not order routine chest radiographs. The overwhelming majority of respondents reserve barium swallow and computed tomographic (CT) scans for evaluation of symptomatic patients. Similarly, nuclear imaging is reserved for patients with specific symptoms or abnormal laboratory tests. Blood tests most frequently monitored include complete blood cell count (CBC) (43%), thyroid function test (22%), and liver function test (20%). Follow-up endoscopic evaluation under anesthesia is reserved for symptomatic patients by over 95% of respondents. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that head and neck surgeons rarely use supplemental studies other than chest radiograph during routine follow up. The authors speculate that routine chest radiograph may be valuable in screening for a second primary carcinoma. Techniques to screen for esophageal tumors remain contentious.
Authors: Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: K Yuasa; T Kawazu; N Kunitake; S Uehara; J Omagari; K Yoshiura; E Nakayama; S Kanda Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ismail Zohdi; Louay S El Sharkawy; Mahmoud F El Bestar; Hazem M Abdel Tawab; Mo'men Aa Hamela; Amal A Hareedy Journal: Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat Date: 2015-02-09