Literature DB >> 10871027

Sonography for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases among patients with tongue cancer: criteria for early detection and assessment of follow-up examination intervals.

K Yuasa1, T Kawazu, N Kunitake, S Uehara, J Omagari, K Yoshiura, E Nakayama, S Kanda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Because the presence of cervical metastasis is one of the factors influencing the outcome of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck, its early detection is potentially very important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristic changes of cervical metastasis revealed by sonography during follow-up and to assess an adequate interval for follow-up sonography of the neck among patients with tongue cancer.
METHODS: Forty-three of 44 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, who had undergone interstitial brachytherapy, were examined with sonography of the neck during the posttherapeutic follow-up period.
RESULTS: Seventeen cervical lymph node metastases were found in 12 of 43 patients during follow-up. Of these 17 cervical metastases, 16 (94.1%) were accurately diagnosed and one (5.9%) was misdiagnosed as nonmetastatic based on sonographic findings. Sonography of the neck performed in seven patients at an interval of less than 1 month since the last follow-up imaging showed 9 (90.0%) of 10 metastases increased by up to 2 mm in short-axis diameter. Five patients who were followed up at an interval of more than 1 month since the last follow-up imaging had seven metastases increase by 3 to 8 mm in short-axis diameter or a change of echogenicity in the internal structure of lymph nodes or both. Pathologic examinations showed extranodal spread in 3 (42.9%) of these 7 metastases.
CONCLUSION: Changes both in size and internal echogenicity can occur as quickly as 2 to 4 weeks between sonographic examinations. Therefore, in high-risk patients, or in those with suspicious sonographic findings, short-interval follow-up sonographic examinations are recommended at least during the first posttherapeutic year. Our findings suggest that follow-up sonography of the neck should be performed monthly, at least during the first posttherapeutic year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10871027      PMCID: PMC7973891     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Correlation between prognosis and degree of lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  I K Kalnins; A G Leonard; K Sako; M S Razack; D P Shedd
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer with special reference to the relationship between the short to long axis ratio (S/L) and the cancer content.

Authors:  N Tohnosu; S Onoda; K Isono
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 0.910

3.  Neck ultrasonography for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Tachimori; H Kato; H Watanabe; H Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Sonography of abnormal lymph nodes in vitro: correlation of sonographic and histologic findings.

Authors:  L Rubaltelli; E Proto; R Salmaso; P Bortoletto; F Candiani; P Cagol
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US.

Authors:  P Vassallo; K Wernecke; N Roos; P E Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Recurrence at the primary site in head and neck cancer and the significance of neck lymph node metastases as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  C R Leemans; R Tiwari; J J Nauta; I van der Waal; G B Snow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Ultrasound B-scans in the follow-up of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  M Westhofen
Journal:  Head Neck Surg       Date:  1987 May-Jun

8.  Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  H J Steinkamp; M Cornehl; N Hosten; W Pegios; T Vogl; R Felix
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Regional lymph node involvement and its significance in the development of distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  C R Leemans; R Tiwari; J J Nauta; I van der Waal; G B Snow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity. Does it make sense?

Authors:  A V de Visscher; J J Manni
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Sonographic examination of the neck after definitive radiotherapy for node-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  S S Yom; A S Garden; G A Staerkel; L E Ginsberg; W H Morrison; E M Sturgis; D I Rosenthal; J N Myers; B S Edeiken-Monroe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of a post-treatment follow-up program in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Andre Peisker; Gregor Franziskus Raschke; Arndt Guentsch; Paul Luepke; Korosh Roshanghias; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Predictive Significance of Tumor Depth and Budding for Late Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Clinical N0 Early Oral Tongue Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukiko Hori; Akira Kubota; Tomoyuki Yokose; Madoka Furukawa; Takeshi Matsushita; Morihito Takita; Sachiyo Mitsunaga; Nobutaka Mizoguchi; Tetsuo Nonaka; Yuko Nakayama; Nobuhiko Oridate
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Advanced clinical usefulness of ultrasonography for diseases in oral and maxillofacial regions.

Authors:  Nao Wakasugi-Sato; Masaaki Kodama; Kou Matsuo; Noriaki Yamamoto; Masafumi Oda; Ayataka Ishikawa; Tatsurou Tanaka; Yuji Seta; Manabu Habu; Shinya Kokuryo; Hisashi Ichimiya; Ikuya Miyamoto; Shinji Kito; Shinobu Matsumoto-Takeda; Tetsuro Wakasugi; Yoshihiro Yamashita; Izumi Yoshioka; Tetsu Takahashi; Kazuhiro Tominaga; Yasuhiro Morimoto
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-04-27

5.  Clinicopathological evaluation of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 as a treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shintaro Kawano; Yanqun Zheng; Kazunari Oobu; Ryota Matsubara; Yuichi Goto; Toru Chikui; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Tamotsu Kiyoshima; Teppei Jinno; Yasuyuki Maruse; Eiji Mitate; Ryoji Kitamura; Hideaki Tanaka; Takeshi Toyoshima; Tsuyoshi Sugiura; Seiji Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Post-therapeutic surveillance schedule for oral cancer: is there agreement?

Authors:  Guicai Liu; Eric J Dierks; R Bryan Bell; Tuan G Bui; Bryce E Potter
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-02

Review 7.  What the clinician wants to know: surgical perspective and ultrasound for lymph node imaging of the neck.

Authors:  Michiel W M van den Brekel; Jonas A Castelijns
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  An Inventory of Current Available Ultrasound Devices for Dental Use.

Authors:  Le Tina; K M Aps Johan
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Is ultrasonography useful in the diagnosis of nasolabial cyst?

Authors:  Ahmet H Acar; Umit Yolcu; Fatih Asutay
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-02-23

10.  Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Namitha Jayapal; Shashi Kiran Mohan Ram; Vidya Sreenivasa Murthy; Sulphi A Basheer; Shaheen V Shamsuddin; Anas Bismillah Khan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.