Literature DB >> 8484144

Monitoring of the motor pathway during spinal surgery.

F Tabaraud1, J M Boulesteix, D Moulies, B Longis, A Lansade, G Terrier, J M Vallat, M Dumas, J Hugont.   

Abstract

Paraplegia caused by irreversible lesions of the spinal cord is one of the major possible complications after scoliosis surgery. Several monitoring methods have been proposed but none are completely satisfactory. Since 1986 the authors assessed motor pathways during scoliosis surgery, using electrical stimulation of the motor cortex and lower limb muscle recordings (tibialis anterior muscle). Twenty-seven patients were included in this study: 25 with idiopathic scoliosis and 2 with dorsal kyphosis. Recordings in anesthetized patients with hypothermia were performed before and after spinal derotation during the surgical procedure. Magnetic cortical stimulation was carried out in ten awake patients before and after surgery. Reproducible responses were obtained in 22 patients under anesthesia. In eight patients no difference of the latency of the muscle response was detected before and after the correction of the spinal angulation. In 14 patients the increase of latency ranged from 0.4 ms to 5.2 ms. No correlation was found between the slowing of motor conduction and the magnitude of spine correction. No central neurologic complications were seen after surgery. The authors concluded that their study demonstrated that motor pathway assessment in anesthetized patients can be performed at different times during the surgical procedure. This technique should help in the future monitoring spinal function during scoliosis surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8484144     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Cervical osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of new developments.

Authors:  Danielle D Langeloo; Henricus L Journee; Paul W Pavlov; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Motor evoked potentials: appropriate positioning of recording electrodes for diagnosis of spinal disorders.

Authors:  J Chomiak; J Dvorak; J Antinnes; A Sandler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Denis S Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Does Not Decrease New Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing One or Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion.

Authors:  Brandon G Wilkinson; Justin T Chang; Natalie A Glass; Cassim M Igram
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in child neurology: current and future directions.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Alexander Rotenberg; Molliann Ousley; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.987

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.