OBJECTIVES: Cervical osteotomy can be performed on patients with cervical kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis. This study reviews the role of two new developments in cervical osteotomy surgery: internal fixation and transcranial electrical stimulated motor evoked potential monitoring (TES-MEP). METHODS: From 1999 to 2004, 16 patients underwent a C7-osteotomy with internal fixation. In 11 patients, cervical osteotomy was performed in a sitting position with halo-cast immobilization (group S), five patients underwent surgery in prone position with Mayfield clamp fixation (group P). In group P, longer fusion towards T4-T6 could be obtained that created a more stable fixation. Therefore, post-operative immobilization protocol of group P was simplified from halo-cast to cervical orthosis. RESULTS: Consolidation was obtained in all patients without loss of correction. Post-operative chin-brow to vertical angle measured 5 degrees (range 0-15). TES-MEP was successfully performed during all surgical procedures. In total, nine neurological events were registered. Additional surgical intervention resulted in recovery of amplitudes in six of nine events. In two patients spontaneous recovery took place. One patient showed no recovery of amplitudes despite surgical intervention and a partial C6 spinal cord lesion occurred. CONCLUSION: We conclude that C7 osteotomy with internal fixation has been shown to be a reliable and stable technique. When surgery is performed the in prone position, distal fixation can be optimally obtained allowing post-operative treatment by cervical orthosis instead of a halo-cast. TES-MEP monitoring has been shown to be a reliable neuromonitoring technique with high clinical relevancy during cervical osteotomy because it allows timely intervention before occurrence of permanent cord damage in a large proportion of the patients.
OBJECTIVES: Cervical osteotomy can be performed on patients with cervical kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis. This study reviews the role of two new developments in cervical osteotomy surgery: internal fixation and transcranial electrical stimulated motor evoked potential monitoring (TES-MEP). METHODS: From 1999 to 2004, 16 patients underwent a C7-osteotomy with internal fixation. In 11 patients, cervical osteotomy was performed in a sitting position with halo-cast immobilization (group S), five patients underwent surgery in prone position with Mayfield clamp fixation (group P). In group P, longer fusion towards T4-T6 could be obtained that created a more stable fixation. Therefore, post-operative immobilization protocol of group P was simplified from halo-cast to cervical orthosis. RESULTS: Consolidation was obtained in all patients without loss of correction. Post-operative chin-brow to vertical angle measured 5 degrees (range 0-15). TES-MEP was successfully performed during all surgical procedures. In total, nine neurological events were registered. Additional surgical intervention resulted in recovery of amplitudes in six of nine events. In two patients spontaneous recovery took place. One patient showed no recovery of amplitudes despite surgical intervention and a partial C6 spinal cord lesion occurred. CONCLUSION: We conclude that C7 osteotomy with internal fixation has been shown to be a reliable and stable technique. When surgery is performed the in prone position, distal fixation can be optimally obtained allowing post-operative treatment by cervical orthosis instead of a halo-cast. TES-MEP monitoring has been shown to be a reliable neuromonitoring technique with high clinical relevancy during cervical osteotomy because it allows timely intervention before occurrence of permanent cord damage in a large proportion of the patients.
Authors: Praveen V Mummaneni; Valli P Mummaneni; Regis W Haid; Gerald E Rodts; Rick C Sasso Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: R P Lesser; P Raudzens; H Lüders; M R Nuwer; W D Goldie; H H Morris; D S Dinner; G Klem; J F Hahn; A G Shetter Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1986-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alan S Hilibrand; Daniel M Schwartz; Venkat Sethuraman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Danielle D Langeloo; Arjan Lelivelt; H Louis Journée; Robert Slappendel; Marinus de Kleuver Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kunal Varshneya; Zachary A Medress; Martin N Stienen; Jay Nathan; Allen Ho; Arjun V Pendharkar; Sheri Loo; Jessica Aikin; Gordon Li; Atman Desai; John K Ratliff; Anand Veeravagu Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2020-04-13