OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients over and under age 65 admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: Prospective, two-center study. Convenience sample of all admissions to two adult ICUs for a 1-yr period, with a 1-yr follow-up. SETTING: Adult multidisciplinary closed ICUs. PATIENTS: All patients (n = 1,040) admitted to two ICUs during a 1-yr period were entered into the study, except patients with self-induced poisoning. Of these patients, 145 patients were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Admission statistics on all patients included demographic, case mix, and severity data. Variables associated with intensive care unit outcomes at discharge (length of stay, mortality) and at 1 yr from admission (mortality, functional capacity, health attitudes) were analyzed. Vital status was confirmed from both Alberta Vital Statistics and Alberta Health. Follow-up interviews were conducted with all available survivors. RESULTS: The elderly group (> 65 yrs) comprised 46% of patients studied. Both age groups (> 65 yrs and < 65 yrs) had comparable demographics and illness severity measures. Although ICU and 1-yr mortality rates differed between groups (16% of > 65 yrs vs. 12.9% of < 65 yrs ICU mortality and 49% of > 65 yrs vs. 31% of < 65 yrs 1-yr mortality), age was not a major contributor to the variance in outcome. At 1 yr, 65% of patients admitted to the study were alive. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 75% of survivors. Assessment of activities of daily living showed that the elderly patients were similar to younger patients. The elderly demonstrated more positive health attitudes than younger survivors. Functional capacity was significantly associated with health attitudes of younger patients, but not for older survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Age does not have an important impact on outcome from critical illness, which is most strongly predicted by severity of illness, length of stay, prior ICU admission and respiratory failure. Satisfaction with personal health should not be inferred from the functional status of elderly survivors of intensive care.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients over and under age 65 admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: Prospective, two-center study. Convenience sample of all admissions to two adult ICUs for a 1-yr period, with a 1-yr follow-up. SETTING: Adult multidisciplinary closed ICUs. PATIENTS: All patients (n = 1,040) admitted to two ICUs during a 1-yr period were entered into the study, except patients with self-induced poisoning. Of these patients, 145 patients were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Admission statistics on all patients included demographic, case mix, and severity data. Variables associated with intensive care unit outcomes at discharge (length of stay, mortality) and at 1 yr from admission (mortality, functional capacity, health attitudes) were analyzed. Vital status was confirmed from both Alberta Vital Statistics and Alberta Health. Follow-up interviews were conducted with all available survivors. RESULTS: The elderly group (> 65 yrs) comprised 46% of patients studied. Both age groups (> 65 yrs and < 65 yrs) had comparable demographics and illness severity measures. Although ICU and 1-yr mortality rates differed between groups (16% of > 65 yrs vs. 12.9% of < 65 yrs ICU mortality and 49% of > 65 yrs vs. 31% of < 65 yrs 1-yr mortality), age was not a major contributor to the variance in outcome. At 1 yr, 65% of patients admitted to the study were alive. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 75% of survivors. Assessment of activities of daily living showed that the elderly patients were similar to younger patients. The elderly demonstrated more positive health attitudes than younger survivors. Functional capacity was significantly associated with health attitudes of younger patients, but not for older survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Age does not have an important impact on outcome from critical illness, which is most strongly predicted by severity of illness, length of stay, prior ICU admission and respiratory failure. Satisfaction with personal health should not be inferred from the functional status of elderly survivors of intensive care.
Authors: Lauren E Ferrante; Margaret A Pisani; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda S Leo-Summers; Thomas M Gill Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Neill K J Adhikari; Karen E A Burns; Jan O Friedrich; Josée Bouchard; Francois Lamontagne; Lauralyn A McIntrye; Jean-François Cailhier; Peter Dodek; Henry T Stelfox; Margaret Herridge; Stephen Lapinsky; John Muscedere; James Barton; Donald Griesdale; Mark Soth; Althea Ambosta; Gerald Lebovic; Ron Wald Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Amber E Barnato; Steven M Albert; Derek C Angus; Judith R Lave; Howard B Degenholtz Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nathan E Brummel; Michele C Balas; Alessandro Morandi; Lauren E Ferrante; Thomas M Gill; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Steve A R Webb; Anthony Delaney; Carol George; David Pilcher; Graeme K Hart; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 9.097