Literature DB >> 8477302

A problematic counter-regulation experiment: implications for the link between dietary restraint and overeating.

B Dritschel1, P J Cooper, D Charnock.   

Abstract

The current study failed to find any evidence of laboratory counter-regulation amongst restrained eaters given a preload, regardless of the measures of dietary restraint used to classify subjects, including dieting status on the day of the study. Furthermore, there was no evidence to suggest that high restrainers characteristically overeat or experience a sense of loss of control over eating in naturalistic settings. These findings indicate that the link between dietary restraint and overeating or bulimic episodes is, at most, a weak one. Future investigations must incorporate more detailed and sensitive measures of both restraint and overeating if analogue studies are to be useful for understanding the process involved in clinically significant episodes of overeating or binge eating.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8477302     DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199304)13:3<297::aid-eat2260130308>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  3 in total

1.  Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status.

Authors:  C A Timko; J Perone
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Neither restrained eating nor tendency toward overeating predict food consumption after tension induction.

Authors:  M A Ouwens; T van Strien; C P van der Staak
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Validity and reliability of the Dietary Rules Inventory (DRI).

Authors:  Simona Calugi; Nicole Morandini; Chiara Milanese; Laura Dametti; Massimiliano Sartirana; Deborah Fasoli; Riccardo Dalle Grave
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.