Literature DB >> 8476803

Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies.

G C Mason1, R J Lilford, J Porter, E Nelson, S Tyrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To help answer the question: should Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical circulation be made available to all pregnant women as part of their routine antenatal care?
DESIGN: A randomised trial.
SETTING: St James's University Hospital, Leeds.
SUBJECTS: 2025 low risk primigravid women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetric intervention rates and short term neonatal morbidity.
RESULTS: The incidence of abnormal Doppler was low (1.7%) with complete absence of end diastolic flow in only 0.3% of cases. No significant differences could be demonstrated between control and study women in any of the outcomes measured.
CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate any benefit or harm from Doppler ultrasound as a routine screening test for all low risk women, whereas our previous studies have suggested that it is useful in high risk pregnancies. Any marginal returns on extending access to Doppler ultrasound from high risk to all women must be small. Since this test has excellent performance characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) for the prediction of fetal hypoxia and acidosis our results call into question the cost to benefit ratio of all tests designed to predict these outcomes in low risk women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476803     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15207.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 2.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-12

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 4.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 5.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 6.  Role of the fetoplacental endothelium in fetal growth restriction with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry.

Authors:  Emily J Su
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

Review 8.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 9.  Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: a systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths.

Authors:  Aamer Imdad; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Saad Siddiqui; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Prevalence of abnormal umbilical arterial flow on Doppler ultrasound in low-risk and unselected pregnant women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Valerie Vannevel; Gianna Robbers; George Gwako; Tina Lavin; Abiodun Adanikin; Tsakane Hlongwane; Robert C Pattinson; Zahida P Qureshi; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.