Literature DB >> 20091499

WITHDRAWN. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

Zarko Alfirevic1, James P Neilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abnormal waveforms from Doppler ultrasound may indicate poor fetal prognosis. It is also possible that Doppler ultrasound could encourage inappropriate early delivery.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies on obstetric care and fetal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. Date of last search: June 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of Doppler ultrasound for the investigation of umbilical artery waveforms in high risk pregnancies compared to no Doppler ultrasound. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by both reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN
RESULTS: Eleven studies involving nearly 7000 women were included. The trials were generally of good quality. Compared to no Doppler ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancy (especially those complicated by hypertension or presumed impaired fetal growth) was associated with a trend to a reduction in perinatal deaths (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.01). The use of Doppler ultrasound was also associated with fewer inductions of labour (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.93) and fewer admissions to hospital (odds ratio 0.56, 95% 0.43 to 0.72), without reports of adverse effects. No difference was found for fetal distress in labour (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.13) or caesarean delivery (odds ratio 0.94, 95% 0.82 to 1.06). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies appears to improve a number of obstetric care outcomes and appears promising in helping to reducing perinatal deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20091499      PMCID: PMC6823238          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000073.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  19 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy.

Authors:  J A Davies; S Gallivan; J A Spencer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Umbilical artery resistance index as a screening test for fetal well-being. II: Randomized feasibility study.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; R Pattinson; D Buckley; J Jennings; C W Redman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Doppler blood flow in pregnancy.

Authors:  P McParland; J M Pearce
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  J P Neilson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-10

5.  Umbilical artery velocimetry may influence clinical interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograms.

Authors:  H Almström; O Axelsson; G Ekman; I Ingemarsson; A Maesel; K Arström; K Marsál
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; J P Neilson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies.

Authors:  G C Mason; R J Lilford; J Porter; E Nelson; S Tyrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-02

8.  The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice.

Authors:  F D Johnstone; R Prescott; P Hoskins; I A Greer; T McGlew; M Compton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-08

9.  Doppler ultrasonography in suspected intrauterine growth retardation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  S J Nienhuis; J S Vles; W J Gerver; H J Hoogland
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in high risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J P Newnham; M R O'Dea; K P Reid; D A Diepeveen
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-10
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Obstetric issues in preterm birth.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Peter W Fowlie; William McGuire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-02

Review 2.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-12

Review 3.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 4.  Cardiotocography and beyond: a review of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound application in fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 5.  Vascular complications in the diabetic pregnancy.

Authors:  Gustavo Leguizamón; Denise Trigubo; Juan Ignacio Pereira; María Fernanda Vera; José Alberto Fernández
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 7.  Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth.

Authors:  Rosalie M Grivell; Lufee Wong; Vineesh Bhatia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

8.  What may cause fetus loss from acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: Analysis of 54 cases.

Authors:  Min Tang; Jian-Ming Xu; Sha-Sha Song; Qiao Mei; Li-Jiu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  The ability of continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound to detect fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Ute Feucht; Helen Mulol; Valerie Vannevel; Robert Pattinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.