Literature DB >> 8475895

Dietary fat and the control of energy intake: evaluating the effects of fat on meal size and postmeal satiety.

J E Blundell1, V J Burley, J R Cotton, C L Lawton.   

Abstract

Three separate experiments in lean subjects confirmed that a 1.52-MJ (362-kcal) carbohydrate supplement at breakfast suppressed appetite 90 min later but had no effect on a test meal given after 270 min. A 1.52-MJ (362-kcal) fat supplement produced no detectable action on measures of appetite at any time point. Therefore, fat and carbohydrate do not have identical effects on the appetite profile. In a further study in obese subjects, a novel experimental design was used to assess the satiating efficiency and compensatory response of fat. Eating from a range of either high-fat or high-carbohydrate foods, obese subjects voluntarily consumed twice as much energy from the fat items, thereby indicating a weak action of fat on satiation. In turn, this large intake of fat exerted a disproportionately weak effect on satiety. These studies suggest that the appetite-control system may have only weak inhibitory mechanisms to prevent the passive overconsumption of dietary fat. The results indicate how this action could induce a positive energy balance and lead to a gradual upward drift in body mass index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475895     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/57.5.772S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of energy density.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 2.  The Macronutrients, Appetite, and Energy Intake.

Authors:  Alicia L Carreiro; Jaapna Dhillon; Susannah Gordon; Kelly A Higgins; Ashley G Jacobs; Breanna M McArthur; Benjamin W Redan; Rebecca L Rivera; Leigh R Schmidt; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

3.  Restricting carbohydrates at breakfast is sufficient to reduce 24-hour exposure to postprandial hyperglycemia and improve glycemic variability.

Authors:  Courtney R Chang; Monique E Francois; Jonathan P Little
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Deconstructing the vanilla milkshake: the dominant effect of sucrose on self-administration of nutrient-flavor mixtures.

Authors:  Amy M Naleid; Jeffrey W Grimm; David A Kessler; Alfred J Sipols; Sepideh Aliakbari; Jennifer L Bennett; Jason Wells; Dianne P Figlewicz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Breakfasts with different fiber and macronutrient contents do not differentially affect timing, size or microstructure of the subsequent lunch.

Authors:  C Silberbauer; P Frey-Rindova; W Langhans
Journal:  Z Ernahrungswiss       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Dietary fats and insulin action.

Authors:  L H Storlien; L A Baur; A D Kriketos; D A Pan; G J Cooney; A B Jenkins; G D Calvert; L V Campbell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Empowerment of women with purging-type bulimia nervosa through nutritional rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Ventura; B Bauer
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Caloric compensation in preschool children: Relationships with body mass and differences by food category.

Authors:  S Carnell; L Benson; E L Gibson; L A Mais; S Warkentin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Dietary fat and body weight control.

Authors:  John C Peters
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.880

10.  No evidence of differential effects of SFA, MUFA or PUFA on post-ingestive satiety and energy intake: a randomised trial of fatty acid saturation.

Authors:  Caroline M Strik; Fiona E Lithander; Anne-Thea McGill; Alastair K MacGibbon; Brian H McArdle; Sally D Poppitt
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.