Literature DB >> 17707949

Deconstructing the vanilla milkshake: the dominant effect of sucrose on self-administration of nutrient-flavor mixtures.

Amy M Naleid1, Jeffrey W Grimm, David A Kessler, Alfred J Sipols, Sepideh Aliakbari, Jennifer L Bennett, Jason Wells, Dianne P Figlewicz.   

Abstract

Rats and humans avidly consume flavored foods that contain sucrose and fat, presumably due to their rewarding qualities. In this study, we hypothesized that the complex mixture of corn oil, sucrose, and flavor is more reinforcing than any of these components alone. We observed a concentration-dependent increase in reinforcers of sucrose solutions received (0%, 3%, 6.25%, and 12.5%) in both fixed ratio and progressive ratio procedures, but with equicaloric corn oil solutions (0%, 1.4%, 2.8%, and 5.6%) this finding was replicated only in the fixed ratio procedure. Likewise, addition of 1.4% oil to 3% or 12.5% sucrose increased fixed ratio, but not progressive ratio, reinforcers received relative to those of sucrose alone. Finally, addition of 3% vanilla flavoring did not change self-administration of 3% sucrose or 3% sucrose+1.4% oil solutions. These data suggest that, calorie-for-calorie, sucrose is the dominant reinforcing component of novel foods that contain a mixture of fat, sucrose, and flavor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707949      PMCID: PMC2266682          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  36 in total

1.  Flavor enhancement of food improves dietary intake and nutritional status of elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  M F Mathey; E Siebelink; C de Graaf; W A Van Staveren
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  Energy density of foods: effects on energy intake.

Authors:  J Stubbs; S Ferres; G Horgan
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.176

3.  Leptin reverses sucrose-conditioned place preference in food-restricted rats.

Authors:  D P Figlewicz; M S Higgins; S B Ng-Evans; P J Havel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-05

Review 4.  The role of energy density.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.880

5.  Preference for vegetable oils in the two-bottle choice test in mice.

Authors:  M Takeda; M Imaizumi; T Fushiki
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Effect of overfeeding macronutrients on day-to-day food intake in man.

Authors:  A M Johnstone; R J Stubbs; C G Harbron
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 7.  Sugars and fats: the neurobiology of preference.

Authors:  Allen S Levine; Catherine M Kotz; Blake A Gosnell
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects.

Authors:  Anne Raben; Tatjana H Vasilaras; A Christina Møller; Arne Astrup
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Binge-type eating induced by limited access in rats does not require energy restriction on the previous day.

Authors:  Rebecca L Corwin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Bottle-choice tests in Sprague-Dawley rats using liquid diets that differ in oil and sucrose contents.

Authors:  Fumiko Kimura; Risa Okada; Yasushi Endo; Kenshiro Fujimoto
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.043

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pre-existing differences in motivation for food and sensitivity to cocaine-induced locomotion in obesity-prone rats.

Authors:  Peter J Vollbrecht; Cameron W Nobile; Aaron M Chadderdon; Emily M Jutkiewicz; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially affect intake of fat/sucrose mixtures under limited access conditions.

Authors:  K J Wong; F H W Wojnicki; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  Incubation of food craving in rats: A review.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Grimm
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of SKF-83566 and haloperidol on performance on progressive ratio schedules maintained by sucrose and corn oil reinforcement: quantitative analysis using a new model derived from the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement (MPR).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Modulation of Food Reward by Endocrine and Environmental Factors: Update and Perspective.

Authors:  Dianne P Figlewicz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 6.  Dopamine and binge eating behaviors.

Authors:  Nicholas T Bello; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Environments predicting intermittent shortening access reduce operant performance but not home cage binge size in rats.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; R K Babbs; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-03-25

8.  Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Obesity: increasing awareness of novel environmental factors.

Authors:  Kevin D Niswender; Bettina M Beech
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Exposure to cues associated with palatable food reward results in a dopamine D₂ receptor-dependent suppression of evoked synaptic responses in the entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Juliana A Hutter; C Andrew Chapman
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.