Literature DB >> 8475706

Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage.

A Heijl1, H Mölder.   

Abstract

We studied the influence of optic disc diameter on the diagnostic power of subjective disc evaluation of glaucoma. One hundred and thirteen colour disc photographs of 91 patients with primary open angle glaucoma and 174 photographs of 89 randomly selected normal subjects were studied. Five ophthalmologists independently classified all eyes as glaucomatous or normal by disc appearance using a masked forced choice design. Sensitivities and specificities varied strongly as a function of disc diameter. Overall sensitivity for recognizing glaucoma by disc inspection was 58% in small discs, 72% in the middle group and 85% in the group of large discs. These differences were significant, and the odds of recognizing a glaucomatous disc as such increased by a factor of 2.07 between each group. Overall specificity was 99.6% in small discs, 95% in the middle group, and 79% in large normal discs. Thus, larger discs were more likely to be classified as glaucomatous whether they were glaucomatous or not, while small discs were more likely to be classified as normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475706     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb04974.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  12 in total

1.  [Measurement of the disc area by indirect ophthalmoscopy].

Authors:  M Haustein; E Schmidt; E Spörl; L E Pillunat; A G Böhm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Neuroretinal rim width ratios in morphological glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; P Lang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Optic disc measurement: a comparison of indirect ophthalmoscopic methods.

Authors:  A F Spencer; S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  H V Danesh-Meyer; B J Gaskin; T Jayusundera; M Donaldson; G D Gamble
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; S T Ruben; A Viswanathan; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Optic disk size and glaucoma.

Authors:  Esther M Hoffmann; Linda M Zangwill; Jonathan G Crowston; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.197

7.  The effect of education on the assessment of optic nerve head photographs for the glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Sabina Andersson; Anders Heijl; Andreas G Boehm; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.

Authors:  S Andersson; A Heijl; B Bengtsson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Ageing and ocular surface immunity.

Authors:  Alireza Mashaghi; Jiaxu Hong; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study.

Authors:  Yasushi Kitaoka; Masaki Tanito; Yu Yokoyama; Koji Nitta; Maki Katai; Kazuko Omodaka; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.