Literature DB >> 8474372

A cost-utility approach to the use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' C colonic carcinoma.

R D Smith1, J Hall, H Gurney, P R Harnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform an economic evaluation of the joint use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with fully resected Dukes' Stage C carcinoma of the colon, compared with resection and no chemotherapy. The evaluation was prompted by a study (N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 352-358) which recommended a new treatment standard for colon cancer: a 52-week course of fluorouracil, with levamisole every second week, as adjuvant chemotherapy. This recommendation raised several concerns, particularly about the quality of life of patients undergoing such a long course of chemotherapy and the costs to the health care system.
METHODS: The cost of the surgery plus chemotherapy was estimated and compared with the cost of surgery alone. Descriptions of quality of life were developed from interviews with patients and health professionals, and the time trade off technique was then used to derive utility weights from a small sample (16) which were used to adjust length of life to reflect quality, in terms of a "quality adjusted life year" (QALY).
RESULTS: Chemotherapy increases the total cost of treating a patient with colon cancer by $7000, from $6000 to $13,000. Incorporating quality of life reduced the extra benefit gained from the chemotherapy from 2.4 life years to 0.4 QALYs. Thus the result is a cost of $17,500 to achieve an extra QALY from this particular treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis are only tentative, as the quality of life descriptions were not measured over time but from a cross-sectional survey of patients, and the valuations of health states were derived from a small sample. However, we believe them to be indicative, and conclude that it is perhaps more appropriate for the use of chemotherapy to be an option rather than standard treatment until further research on these aspects is complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8474372     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

Review 3.  Systemic therapy in breast cancer: efficacy and cost utility.

Authors:  J F Corry; P E Lønning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jennie H Best; Louis P Garrison; William Hollingworth; Scott D Ramsey; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The value of vision.

Authors:  Christine Knauer; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Management of colorectal cancer in elderly patients: focus on the cost of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Matasar; Vijaya Sundararajan; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Systematic review of health state utility values for economic evaluation of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim Jeong; John Cairns
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.