Literature DB >> 8472991

Radioisotope determination of regional colonic transit in severe constipation: comparison with radio opaque markers.

J R van der Sijp1, M A Kamm, J M Nightingale, K E Britton, S J Mather, G P Morris, L M Akkermans, J E Lennard-Jones.   

Abstract

Radio-opaque markers have a well established role in distinguishing between patients with normal and those with slow intestinal transit, but in the latter group their accuracy in defining the region of delay has not been established. To study regional colonic transit accurately the transit of a radioisotope labelled meal was determined and findings were compared with those of simultaneously ingested radio-opaque markers. Twelve healthy controls (mean age 33 years) and 12 severely constipated women (mean age 36 years, bowel frequency < once per week) were studied On day 1, a meal containing 10 MBq 111In bound to 0.7 mm resin microspheres was ingested. Subjects also ingested a set of radiologically distinguishable markers on three successive days. Abdominal scans were obtained three times daily for 7 days. Abdominal radiographs were obtained after 72 or 96 hours and again at 144 or 168 hours. Eight 'regions of interest' were created--one for the small bowel, six for the colon, and one for excreted stool. The constipated patients all showed colonic transit outside the normal range, with a variable site of delay demonstrated by time activity curves for each region. To provide a different measure of the effectiveness of colonic transport, the movement of the 'centre of mass' for the radioisotope and for the markers was then determined. The radioisotope and radiopaque marker methods gave similar results. At all times between 24 and 144 hours there was no significant difference for the position of the centre of mass between the radio-opaque and marker methods. At all times, however, the mean difference between the markers and the radioisotopes was positive, indicating that the center of mass of the markers was always head of that of the radioisotope. The mean difference between the methods was never greater than one region of interest, and ranged from 12 to 72% of one region of interest in the colon. The difference between these two methods could reach up to two colonic segments in certain patients at one time. Radioisotope ingestion provides accurate information about the transit through individual colonic regions because of the possibility of frequent observations and the clear delineation of the entire colon. Although these features were not obtained with radio-opaque markers, they are suitable as a screening test for the presence and pattern of colonic delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8472991      PMCID: PMC1374150          DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.3.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  19 in total

1.  Left hemicolectomy with rectal excision for severe idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  M A Kamm; J R van der Sijp; P R Hawley; R K Phillips; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Transit of solids through the human colon: regional quantification in the unprepared bowel.

Authors:  M Proano; M Camilleri; S F Phillips; M L Brown; G M Thomforde
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-06

3.  Patterns of colonic transit in chronic idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  B Krevsky; A H Maurer; R S Fisher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  A ne method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers.

Authors:  J M Hinton; J E Lennard-Jones; A C Young
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Colonic mass movements in idiopathic chronic constipation.

Authors:  G Bassotti; M Gaburri; B P Imbimbo; L Rossi; F Farroni; M A Pelli; A Morelli
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The design of a two-phase radiolabelled meal for gastric emptying studies.

Authors:  S J Mather; D Ellison; J Nightingale; M Kamm; K E Britton
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.690

7.  Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  T Stivland; M Camilleri; M Vassallo; M Proano; D Rath; M Brown; G Thomforde; J Pemberton; S Phillips
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Determination of total and segmental colonic transit time in constipated patients. Results in 91 patients with a new simplified method.

Authors:  S Chaussade; A Khyari; H Roche; M Garret; M Gaudric; D Couturier; J Guerre
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Dynamic scanning defines a colonic defect in severe idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  M A Kamm; J E Lennard-Jones; D G Thompson; R Sobnack; N W Garvie; M Granowska
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Colectomy for constipation: physiologic investigation is the key to success.

Authors:  S D Wexner; N Daniel; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain.

Authors:  W G Thompson; G F Longstreth; D A Drossman; K W Heaton; E J Irvine; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome: Myth or new treatment target?

Authors:  Emanuele Sinagra; Giancarlo Pompei; Giovanni Tomasello; Francesco Cappello; Gaetano Cristian Morreale; Georgios Amvrosiadis; Francesca Rossi; Attilio Ignazio Lo Monte; Aroldo Gabriele Rizzo; Dario Raimondo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Low-power wireless electronic capsule for long-term gastrointestinal monitoring.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Guozheng Yan; Li Lu; Fei Xu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Selective stimulation of colonic transit by the benzofuran 5HT4 agonist, prucalopride, in healthy humans.

Authors:  E P Bouras; M Camilleri; D D Burton; S McKinzie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Gastrointestinal transit and prolonged ambulatory colonic motility in health and faecal incontinence.

Authors:  F Herbst; M A Kamm; G P Morris; K Britton; J Woloszko; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The small intestine and colon.

Authors:  J B Stubbs
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-04

7.  Standard medical therapies do not alter colonic transit time in children with treatment-resistant slow-transit constipation.

Authors:  Melanie C C Clarke; Janet W Chase; Susie Gibb; Anthony G Catto-Smith; John M Hutson; Bridget R Southwell
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Is irritable bowel syndrome an organic disorder?

Authors:  Magdy El-Salhy; Doris Gundersen; Odd Helge Gilja; Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk; Trygve Hausken
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in gastrointestinal motor disorders.

Authors:  G S Hebbard; W M Sun; F Bochner; M Horowitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Childhood and adolescent constipation: review and advances in management.

Authors:  Nader N Youssef
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.